MRCP vs. APRD
MRCP (PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - March) and APRD (Innovator Premium Income 10 Barrier ETF - April) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. MRCP charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for APRD.
Performance
MRCP vs. APRD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MRCP
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 2.27%
- YTD
- 7.27%
- 6M
- 8.29%
- 1Y
- 18.03%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
APRD
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MRCP vs. APRD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MRCP PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - March | 6.11% |
APRD Innovator Premium Income 10 Barrier ETF - April | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MRCP vs. APRD — Risk / Return Rank
MRCP
APRD
MRCP vs. APRD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - March (MRCP) and Innovator Premium Income 10 Barrier ETF - April (APRD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MRCP | APRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.76 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.57 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MRCP | APRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.91 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.60 | — | — |
Drawdowns
MRCP vs. APRD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MRCP drawdown since its inception was -10.73%, which is greater than APRD's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRCP and APRD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MRCP | APRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.73% | 0.00% | -10.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.81% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.22% | 0.00% | -0.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.77% | 0.00% | -0.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.84% | — | — |
Volatility
MRCP vs. APRD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MRCP | APRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.36% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.95% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.24% | 0.00% | +6.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.27% | 0.00% | +9.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.27% | 0.00% | +9.27% |
MRCP vs. APRD - Expense Ratio Comparison
MRCP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than APRD's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
MRCP vs. APRD - Dividend Comparison
Neither MRCP nor APRD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, MRCP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MRCP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for APRD.
MRCP and APRD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: PGIM and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for MRCP and 0.79% for APRD.
Find the right allocation for MRCP and APRD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer