MRC vs. NEM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MRC (MRC Global Inc.) and NEM (Newmont Goldcorp Corporation) are both stocks. MRC operates in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services (Energy), while NEM operates in Gold (Basic Materials). At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

MRC vs. NEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MRC Global Inc. (MRC) and Newmont Goldcorp Corporation (NEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

MRC

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NEM

• 1D: -1.85%
• 1M: -0.56%
• YTD: 8.10%
• 6M: 20.40%
• 1Y: 96.26%
• 3Y*: 39.72%
• 5Y*: 11.70%
• 10Y*: 14.53%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MRC vs. NEM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MRC MRC Global Inc.	0.00%	7.82%	16.08%	-4.92%	68.31%	3.77%	-51.39%	11.53%	-27.72%	-16.49%
NEM Newmont Goldcorp Corporation	8.10%	172.82%	-7.83%	-8.76%	-20.77%	7.40%	40.28%	30.52%	-6.15%	10.91%

Correlation

The correlation between MRC and NEM is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.00
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.15
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.19
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.10
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 2012	0.12

The correlation between MRC and NEM shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.19 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS MRC : -$0.48 NEM : $6.34
PS Ratio MRC : 0.43 NEM : 5.18
Total Revenue (TTM) MRC : $2.76B NEM : $17.23B
Gross Profit (TTM) MRC : $542.00M NEM : $8.97B
EBITDA (TTM) MRC : $93.00M NEM : $13.78B

Return for Risk

MRC vs. NEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NEM

NEM Risk / Return Rank: 84
NEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
NEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
NEM Omega Ratio Rank: 82
NEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
NEM Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MRC vs. NEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MRC Global Inc. (MRC) and Newmont Goldcorp Corporation (NEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MRC	NEM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.09	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.31	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.41	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.13	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	MRC	NEM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-81.30%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-27.25%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-36.57%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-62.40%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-62.40%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-18.20%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-41.39%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	9.94%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MRC	NEM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	13.05%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	36.01%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	46.26%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	37.67%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	35.50%	—

Dividends

MRC vs. NEM - Dividend Comparison

MRC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MRC MRC Global Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NEM Newmont Goldcorp Corporation	0.95%	1.00%	2.69%	3.87%	4.66%	3.55%	1.74%	3.31%	1.62%	0.67%	0.37%	0.56%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MRC and NEM in my portfolio?

MRC and NEM have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.