MRBIX vs. TGLMX
Compare and contrast key facts about MFS Total Return Bond Fund (MRBIX) and TCW Total Return Bond Fund (TGLMX).
MRBIX is managed by MFS. It was launched on Jan 4, 1999. TGLMX is managed by TCW. It was launched on Jun 17, 1993.
Performance
MRBIX vs. TGLMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MRBIX vs. TGLMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MRBIX MFS Total Return Bond Fund | -0.26% | 7.35% | 1.77% | 6.45% | -14.52% | -0.84% | 8.83% | 9.96% | -1.03% | 4.15% |
TGLMX TCW Total Return Bond Fund | 0.31% | 8.99% | 1.82% | 5.05% | -16.59% | -1.05% | 8.32% | 7.28% | 0.80% | 3.44% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MRBIX achieves a -0.26% return, which is significantly lower than TGLMX's 0.31% return. Over the past 10 years, MRBIX has outperformed TGLMX with an annualized return of 2.02%, while TGLMX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.52% annualized return.
MRBIX
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- -0.26%
- 6M
- 0.50%
- 1Y
- 3.94%
- 3Y*
- 3.88%
- 5Y*
- 0.21%
- 10Y*
- 2.02%
TGLMX
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -1.52%
- YTD
- 0.31%
- 6M
- 1.30%
- 1Y
- 5.07%
- 3Y*
- 4.13%
- 5Y*
- -0.15%
- 10Y*
- 1.52%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MRBIX vs. TGLMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MRBIX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than TGLMX's 0.49% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MRBIX vs. TGLMX — Risk / Return Rank
MRBIX
TGLMX
MRBIX vs. TGLMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Total Return Bond Fund (MRBIX) and TCW Total Return Bond Fund (TGLMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MRBIX | TGLMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.99 | 1.10 | -0.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.43 | 1.60 | -0.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.20 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.72 | 1.71 | +0.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.10 | 5.02 | +0.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MRBIX | TGLMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 | 1.10 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 | -0.02 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | 0.27 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.97 | 0.40 | +0.57 |
Correlation
The correlation between MRBIX and TGLMX is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MRBIX vs. TGLMX - Dividend Comparison
MRBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.88%, less than TGLMX's 6.41% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MRBIX MFS Total Return Bond Fund | 3.88% | 4.21% | 3.69% | 3.42% | 2.39% | 3.42% | 3.00% | 3.06% | 2.87% | 2.65% | 3.02% | 3.76% |
TGLMX TCW Total Return Bond Fund | 6.41% | 7.19% | 6.52% | 6.13% | 3.27% | 2.08% | 3.37% | 4.07% | 3.55% | 2.89% | 4.13% | 2.88% |
Drawdowns
MRBIX vs. TGLMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MRBIX drawdown since its inception was -19.25%, smaller than the maximum TGLMX drawdown of -22.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRBIX and TGLMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MRBIX | TGLMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.25% | -22.26% | +3.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.77% | -3.28% | +0.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.25% | -22.17% | +2.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.25% | -22.26% | +3.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.05% | -3.63% | +1.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.48% | -3.80% | +1.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.93% | 1.12% | -0.19% |
Volatility
MRBIX vs. TGLMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MFS Total Return Bond Fund (MRBIX) is 1.46%, while TCW Total Return Bond Fund (TGLMX) has a volatility of 1.77%. This indicates that MRBIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TGLMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MRBIX | TGLMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.46% | 1.77% | -0.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.50% | 2.89% | -0.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.24% | 5.01% | -0.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.70% | 7.03% | -1.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.90% | 5.57% | -0.67% |