PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MRAL vs. SPUU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MRAL vs. SPUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long MARA Daily ETF (MRAL) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares (SPUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MRAL achieves a 65.74% return, which is significantly higher than SPUU's 19.82% return.


MRAL

1D
-4.00%
1M
33.63%
YTD
65.74%
6M
-16.49%
1Y
-60.79%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPUU

1D
-1.27%
1M
10.01%
YTD
19.82%
6M
19.11%
1Y
53.61%
3Y*
38.21%
5Y*
20.19%
10Y*
24.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MRAL vs. SPUU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MRAL and SPUU is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2025

0.52

The correlation between MRAL and SPUU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

MRAL vs. SPUU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MRAL
SPUU

Financial Services

66.7%
4.8%

Basic Materials

-

0.7%

Communication Services

-

4.6%

Consumer Cyclical

-

4.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

2.0%

Energy

-

1.4%

Healthcare

-

3.6%

Industrials

-

3.3%

Real Estate

-

0.8%

Technology

-

16.5%

Utilities

-

1.1%

Financial Services

MRAL
66.7%
SPUU
4.8%

Basic Materials

MRAL

-

SPUU
0.7%

Communication Services

MRAL

-

SPUU
4.6%

Consumer Cyclical

MRAL

-

SPUU
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

MRAL

-

SPUU
2.0%

Energy

MRAL

-

SPUU
1.4%

Healthcare

MRAL

-

SPUU
3.6%

Industrials

MRAL

-

SPUU
3.3%

Real Estate

MRAL

-

SPUU
0.8%

Technology

MRAL

-

SPUU
16.5%

Utilities

MRAL

-

SPUU
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MRAL vs. SPUU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MRAL
MRAL Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
MRAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRAL Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
MRAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRAL Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

SPUU
SPUU Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
SPUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPUU Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
SPUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPUU Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MRAL vs. SPUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long MARA Daily ETF (MRAL) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares (SPUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MRALSPUUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.38

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.65

2.96

-3.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.92

13.06

-13.98

MRAL vs. SPUU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MRAL Sharpe Ratio is -0.40, which is lower than the SPUU Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MRAL and SPUU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MRALSPUUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.40

2.26

-2.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.40

0.63

-1.03

Drawdowns

MRAL vs. SPUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MRAL drawdown since its inception was -93.46%, which is greater than SPUU's maximum drawdown of -59.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRAL and SPUU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MRALSPUUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.46%

-59.35%

-34.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-93.46%

-18.19%

-75.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-78.17%

-1.27%

-76.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-56.03%

-9.51%

-46.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

66.02%

4.12%

+61.90%

Volatility

MRAL vs. SPUU - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long MARA Daily ETF (MRAL) has a higher volatility of 33.29% compared to Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares (SPUU) at 5.71%. This indicates that MRAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MRALSPUUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

33.29%

5.71%

+27.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

115.01%

18.09%

+96.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

153.49%

23.90%

+129.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

164.22%

33.46%

+130.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

164.22%

35.77%

+128.45%

MRAL vs. SPUU - Expense Ratio Comparison

MRAL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SPUU's 0.64% expense ratio.


Dividends

MRAL vs. SPUU - Dividend Comparison

MRAL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPUU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MRAL
GraniteShares 2x Long MARA Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPUU
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares
1.34%1.63%0.55%0.83%0.88%3.04%8.03%1.80%5.50%6.96%8.08%4.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


MRAL and SPUU have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MRAL has higher volatility (33.29%) compared to SPUU (5.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MRAL dropped -93.46% vs SPUU's -59.35%.

On 1-year performance, SPUU leads with 53.61% vs -60.79% for MRAL. On fees, SPUU is cheaper at 0.64% per year. On volatility, SPUU has been the lower-risk option at 5.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SPUU has performed better with a 53.61% return vs -60.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPUU is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MRAL.

SPUU has the higher dividend yield at 1.34%, compared with 0.00% for MRAL.

MRAL tracks MARA Holdings Inc. (MARA), while SPUU tracks S&P 500 Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for MRAL and 0.64% for SPUU.

SPUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs -0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MRAL and SPUU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer