MRAL vs. QTJL

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

MRAL (GraniteShares 2x Long MARA Daily ETF) and QTJL (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July) are both Leveraged Equities funds. MRAL is passively managed, while QTJL is actively managed. Over the past year, MRAL returned -81.59% vs 14.88% for QTJL. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MRAL charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTJL.

Performance

MRAL vs. QTJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long MARA Daily ETF (MRAL) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MRAL achieves a 14.77% return, which is significantly higher than QTJL's 4.97% return.

MRAL

• 1D: -6.58%
• 1M: -28.81%
• 6M: -16.11%
• YTD: 14.77%
• 1Y: -81.59%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QTJL

• 1D: -1.54%
• 1M: -1.99%
• 6M: 3.87%
• YTD: 4.97%
• 1Y: 14.88%
• 3Y*: 17.19%
• 5Y*: 9.67%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MRAL vs. QTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MRAL GraniteShares 2x Long MARA Daily ETF	14.77%	-82.23%
QTJL Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July	4.97%	24.22%

Correlation

The correlation between MRAL and QTJL is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2025	0.49

MRAL vs. QTJL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MRAL	QTJL
Financial Services	66.6%	0.2%
Basic Materials	-	1.0%
Communication Services	-	14.5%
Consumer Cyclical	-	11.6%
Consumer Defensive	-	6.6%
Energy	-	0.5%
Healthcare	-	3.7%
Industrials	-	2.6%
Real Estate	-	0.1%
Technology	-	58.0%
Utilities	-	1.2%

Return for Risk

MRAL vs. QTJL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MRAL

MRAL Risk / Return Rank: 4
MRAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
MRAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
MRAL Omega Ratio Rank: 6
MRAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
MRAL Martin Ratio Rank: 4

QTJL

QTJL Risk / Return Rank: 59
QTJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
QTJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
QTJL Omega Ratio Rank: 60
QTJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
QTJL Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MRAL vs. QTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long MARA Daily ETF (MRAL) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MRAL	QTJL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.52	1.43	-1.95
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.43	2.03	-2.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.95	1.29	-0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.87	2.24	-3.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.15	11.30	-12.46

MRAL vs. QTJL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MRAL Sharpe Ratio is -0.52, which is lower than the QTJL Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MRAL and QTJL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MRAL vs. QTJL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MRAL drawdown since its inception was -93.46%, which is greater than QTJL's maximum drawdown of -33.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRAL and QTJL.

Drawdown Indicators

	MRAL	QTJL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.46%	-33.40%	-60.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-93.46%	-6.68%	-86.78%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-22.43%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.40%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-84.88%	-2.39%	-82.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-57.75%	-7.78%	-49.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	70.78%	1.32%	+69.46%

Volatility

MRAL vs. QTJL - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long MARA Daily ETF (MRAL) has a higher volatility of 43.07% compared to Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL) at 3.81%. This indicates that MRAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTJL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MRAL	QTJL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	43.07%	3.81%	+39.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	121.06%	8.24%	+112.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	157.27%	10.50%	+146.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	164.70%	20.33%	+144.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	164.70%	20.27%	+144.43%

MRAL vs. QTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

MRAL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than QTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

MRAL vs. QTJL - Dividend Comparison

Neither MRAL nor QTJL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MRAL and QTJL in my portfolio?

MRAL and QTJL have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MRAL or QTJL?

MRAL has higher volatility (43.07%) compared to QTJL (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MRAL dropped -93.46% vs QTJL's -33.40%.

Which ETF is better, MRAL or QTJL?

On 1-year performance, QTJL leads with 14.88% vs -81.59% for MRAL. On fees, QTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QTJL has been the lower-risk option at 3.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MRAL or QTJL?

Over the 1-year period, QTJL has performed better with a 14.88% return vs -81.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MRAL or QTJL?

QTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MRAL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MRAL or QTJL?

MRAL and QTJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between MRAL and QTJL?

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for MRAL and 0.79% for QTJL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QTJL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs -0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.