MFM vs. SPY
MFM (MFS Municipal Income Trust) is a stock, while SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) is S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Over the past 10 years, MFM returned 1.55%/yr vs 15.49%/yr for SPY. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MFM vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFM achieves a 1.10% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's 10.91% return. Over the past 10 years, MFM has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of 1.55%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 15.49% annualized return.
MFM
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- 1.10%
- 6M
- 1.74%
- 1Y
- 11.35%
- 3Y*
- 7.06%
- 5Y*
- -1.06%
- 10Y*
- 1.55%
SPY
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 5.05%
- YTD
- 10.91%
- 6M
- 10.91%
- 1Y
- 27.98%
- 3Y*
- 22.35%
- 5Y*
- 13.83%
- 10Y*
- 15.49%
MFM vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFM MFS Municipal Income Trust | 1.10% | 6.95% | 8.35% | 4.11% | -22.63% | 9.45% | -0.87% | 20.83% | -5.56% | 9.45% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 10.91% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 18.33% | 31.22% | -4.57% | 21.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between MFM and SPY is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 1993 | 0.10 |
The correlation between MFM and SPY shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (all time) to 0.24 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MFM vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
MFM
SPY
MFM vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Municipal Income Trust (MFM) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MFM | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.43 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.84 | 3.16 | -1.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.94 | 14.72 | -8.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MFM | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.07 | 2.38 | -1.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.08 | 0.82 | -0.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 | 0.87 | -0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.59 | -0.38 |
Drawdowns
MFM vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFM drawdown since its inception was -54.24%, roughly equal to the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFM and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFM | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.24% | -55.19% | +0.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.21% | -8.88% | +2.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.01% | -18.76% | +1.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.39% | -24.50% | -9.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.39% | -33.72% | -0.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.03% | -0.70% | -8.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.95% | -9.05% | +0.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.91% | 1.91% | 0.00% |
Volatility
MFM vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
MFS Municipal Income Trust (MFM) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) have volatilities of 2.88% and 2.84%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MFM | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.88% | 2.84% | +0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.11% | 8.90% | -0.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.62% | 11.83% | -1.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.15% | 17.05% | -2.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.72% | 17.94% | -3.22% |
Dividends
MFM vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
MFM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.36%, more than SPY's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFM MFS Municipal Income Trust | 5.36% | 5.08% | 4.65% | 4.12% | 4.85% | 4.34% | 4.70% | 4.71% | 5.91% | 5.61% | 5.72% | 5.76% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 0.98% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MFM and SPY have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MFM has higher volatility (2.88%) compared to SPY (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFM dropped -54.24% vs SPY's -55.19%.
SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MFM and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer