MQQQ vs. QQQP
MQQQ (Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF) and QQQP (Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. MQQQ is passively managed, while QQQP is actively managed. Over the past year, MQQQ returned 83.05% vs 77.97% for QQQP. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 1.30% expense ratio.
Performance
MQQQ vs. QQQP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MQQQ achieves a 39.32% return, which is significantly higher than QQQP's 36.32% return.
MQQQ
- 1D
- 1.03%
- 1M
- 20.59%
- YTD
- 39.32%
- 6M
- 35.46%
- 1Y
- 83.05%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQP
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- 18.29%
- YTD
- 36.32%
- 6M
- 32.45%
- 1Y
- 77.97%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MQQQ vs. QQQP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MQQQ Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF | 39.32% | 31.67% | 10.70% |
QQQP Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF | 36.32% | 30.21% | 10.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between MQQQ and QQQP is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2024 | 0.99 |
The correlation between MQQQ and QQQP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MQQQ vs. QQQP — Risk / Return Rank
MQQQ
QQQP
MQQQ vs. QQQP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF (MQQQ) and Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF (QQQP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MQQQ | QQQP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.60 | 2.45 | +0.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.07 | 2.94 | +0.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.38 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.40 | 3.17 | +0.23 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.24 | 11.62 | +0.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MQQQ | QQQP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.60 | 2.45 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.33 | 1.15 | +0.17 |
Drawdowns
MQQQ vs. QQQP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MQQQ drawdown since its inception was -42.16%, roughly equal to the maximum QQQP drawdown of -42.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MQQQ and QQQP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MQQQ | QQQP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.16% | -42.50% | +0.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.23% | -25.35% | +0.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.18% | -7.35% | +0.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.00% | 6.92% | +0.08% |
Volatility
MQQQ vs. QQQP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF (MQQQ) is 8.50%, while Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF (QQQP) has a volatility of 8.99%. This indicates that MQQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MQQQ | QQQP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.50% | 8.99% | -0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.50% | 24.63% | -0.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.19% | 32.06% | +0.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.26% | 43.85% | -0.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.26% | 43.85% | -0.59% |
MQQQ vs. QQQP - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both MQQQ and QQQP have an expense ratio of 1.30%.
Dividends
MQQQ vs. QQQP - Dividend Comparison
MQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, while QQQP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
MQQQ Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF | 1.45% | 2.02% | 0.02% |
QQQP Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, MQQQ and QQQP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
QQQP has higher volatility (8.99%) compared to MQQQ (8.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MQQQ dropped -42.16% vs QQQP's -42.50%.
On 1-year performance, MQQQ leads with 83.05% vs 77.97% for QQQP. Both ETFs have the same 1.30% expense ratio. On volatility, MQQQ has been the lower-risk option at 8.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MQQQ has performed better with a 83.05% return vs 77.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MQQQ and QQQP have the same expense ratio: 1.30% per year.
MQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 0.00% for QQQP.
They also come from different issuers: AXS and Tradr.
MQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 2.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MQQQ and QQQP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer