PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MQQQ vs. GRID
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MQQQ vs. GRID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF (MQQQ) and First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index (GRID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MQQQ achieves a 39.32% return, which is significantly higher than GRID's 29.13% return.


MQQQ

1D
1.03%
1M
20.59%
YTD
39.32%
6M
35.46%
1Y
83.05%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GRID

1D
2.13%
1M
3.32%
YTD
29.13%
6M
30.52%
1Y
53.09%
3Y*
26.34%
5Y*
18.17%
10Y*
19.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MQQQ vs. GRID - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MQQQ and GRID is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2024

0.79

The correlation between MQQQ and GRID has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MQQQ vs. GRID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MQQQ
MQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
MQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
MQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
MQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
MQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

GRID
GRID Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
GRID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRID Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRID Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
GRID Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRID Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MQQQ vs. GRID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF (MQQQ) and First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index (GRID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MQQQGRIDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.60

2.75

-0.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.07

3.58

-0.51

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.46

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.40

4.57

-1.17

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.24

17.34

-5.10

MQQQ vs. GRID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MQQQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is comparable to the GRID Sharpe Ratio of 2.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MQQQ and GRID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MQQQGRIDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.60

2.75

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.33

0.57

+0.76

Drawdowns

MQQQ vs. GRID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MQQQ drawdown since its inception was -42.16%, roughly equal to the maximum GRID drawdown of -40.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MQQQ and GRID.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MQQQGRIDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.16%

-40.56%

-1.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.23%

-11.73%

-13.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.16%

+1.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.18%

-8.43%

+1.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.00%

3.09%

+3.91%

Volatility

MQQQ vs. GRID - Volatility Comparison

Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF (MQQQ) has a higher volatility of 8.50% compared to First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index (GRID) at 7.99%. This indicates that MQQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GRID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MQQQGRIDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.50%

7.99%

+0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.50%

16.13%

+8.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.19%

19.39%

+12.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.26%

21.00%

+22.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.26%

22.81%

+20.45%

MQQQ vs. GRID - Expense Ratio Comparison

MQQQ has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than GRID's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

MQQQ vs. GRID - Dividend Comparison

MQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, more than GRID's 0.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GRID
First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index
0.76%1.01%1.06%1.23%1.26%0.63%0.68%1.26%1.28%1.07%1.07%1.23%
MQQQ
Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF
1.45%2.02%0.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MQQQ and GRID have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MQQQ has higher volatility (8.50%) compared to GRID (7.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MQQQ dropped -42.16% vs GRID's -40.56%.

On 1-year performance, MQQQ leads with 83.05% vs 53.09% for GRID. On fees, GRID is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, GRID has been the lower-risk option at 7.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MQQQ has performed better with a 83.05% return vs 53.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GRID is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for MQQQ.

MQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 0.76% for GRID.

MQQQ is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while GRID is Alternative Energy Equities. MQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (200%), while GRID tracks NASDAQ OMX Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: AXS and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for MQQQ and 0.70% for GRID.

GRID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 2.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MQQQ and GRID

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer