MQQQ vs. CRMG

Last updated Jun 21, 2026

MQQQ (Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF) and CRMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. MQQQ is passively managed, while CRMG is actively managed. Over the past year, MQQQ returned 78.82% vs -73.96% for CRMG. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MQQQ charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CRMG.

Performance

MQQQ vs. CRMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF (MQQQ) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MQQQ achieves a 36.94% return, which is significantly higher than CRMG's -71.77% return.

MQQQ

• 1D: 5.19%
• 1M: 6.33%
• YTD: 36.94%
• 6M: 35.97%
• 1Y: 78.82%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CRMG

• 1D: -4.21%
• 1M: -28.20%
• YTD: -71.77%
• 6M: -70.70%
• 1Y: -73.96%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MQQQ vs. CRMG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MQQQ Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF	36.94%	75.58%
CRMG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF	-71.77%	-0.29%

Correlation

The correlation between MQQQ and CRMG is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2025	0.30

Return for Risk

MQQQ vs. CRMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MQQQ

MQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 64
MQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
MQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
MQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 61
MQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
MQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 62

CRMG

CRMG Risk / Return Rank: 1
CRMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
CRMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
CRMG Omega Ratio Rank: 1
CRMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
CRMG Martin Ratio Rank: 0

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MQQQ vs. CRMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF (MQQQ) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MQQQ	CRMG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.20	-0.97	+3.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.67	-1.81	+4.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	0.79	+0.56
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.08	-0.97	+4.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.79	-1.72	+12.51

MQQQ vs. CRMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MQQQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is higher than the CRMG Sharpe Ratio of -0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MQQQ and CRMG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MQQQ vs. CRMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MQQQ drawdown since its inception was -42.16%, smaller than the maximum CRMG drawdown of -79.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MQQQ and CRMG.

Drawdown Indicators

	MQQQ	CRMG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.16%	-79.35%	+37.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.23%	-76.24%	+51.01%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.71%	-79.35%	+77.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.17%	-38.92%	+31.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.18%	42.87%	-35.69%

Volatility

MQQQ vs. CRMG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF (MQQQ) is 16.60%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG) has a volatility of 32.19%. This indicates that MQQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MQQQ	CRMG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.60%	32.19%	-15.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.67%	63.62%	-34.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.35%	75.98%	-40.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	44.23%	75.50%	-31.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	44.23%	75.50%	-31.27%

MQQQ vs. CRMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

MQQQ has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than CRMG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

MQQQ vs. CRMG - Dividend Comparison

MQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, while CRMG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CRMG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MQQQ Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF	1.47%	2.02%	0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MQQQ and CRMG in my portfolio?

MQQQ and CRMG have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MQQQ or CRMG?

CRMG has higher volatility (32.19%) compared to MQQQ (16.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MQQQ dropped -42.16% vs CRMG's -79.35%.

Which ETF is better, MQQQ or CRMG?

On 1-year performance, MQQQ leads with 78.82% vs -73.96% for CRMG. On fees, CRMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, MQQQ has been the lower-risk option at 16.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MQQQ or CRMG?

Over the 1-year period, MQQQ has performed better with a 78.82% return vs -73.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MQQQ or CRMG?

CRMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for MQQQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MQQQ or CRMG?

MQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.47%, compared with 0.00% for CRMG.

What is the main difference between MQQQ and CRMG?

They also come from different issuers: AXS and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for MQQQ and 0.75% for CRMG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs -0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.