MQ vs. AFRM
MQ (Marqeta, Inc.) and AFRM (Affirm Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — MQ in Software - Infrastructure, AFRM in Information Technology Services. Over the past 3 years, MQ returned -7.18%/yr vs 61.61%/yr for AFRM. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
MQ vs. AFRM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MQ achieves a -18.53% return, which is significantly lower than AFRM's -10.96% return.
MQ
- 1D
- -5.61%
- 1M
- -14.38%
- YTD
- -18.53%
- 6M
- -18.35%
- 1Y
- -27.66%
- 3Y*
- -7.18%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AFRM
- 1D
- -6.68%
- 1M
- -1.21%
- YTD
- -10.96%
- 6M
- -4.84%
- 1Y
- 20.58%
- 3Y*
- 61.61%
- 5Y*
- 2.13%
- 10Y*
- —
MQ vs. AFRM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MQ Marqeta, Inc. | -18.53% | 25.33% | -45.70% | 14.24% | -64.41% | -43.74% |
AFRM Affirm Holdings, Inc. | -10.96% | 22.22% | 23.93% | 408.17% | -90.38% | 66.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between MQ and AFRM is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2021 | 0.54 |
The correlation between MQ and AFRM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
MQ:
$1.68B
AFRM:
$23.07B
MQ:
$0.00
AFRM:
$1.10
MQ:
805.57
AFRM:
60.14
MQ:
2.68
AFRM:
7.19
MQ:
2.26
AFRM:
6.10
MQ:
$651.61M
AFRM:
$3.20B
MQ:
$456.19M
AFRM:
$2.00B
MQ:
$24.62M
AFRM:
$908.84M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MQ vs. AFRM — Risk / Return Rank
MQ
AFRM
MQ vs. AFRM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Marqeta, Inc. (MQ) and Affirm Holdings, Inc. (AFRM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MQ | AFRM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.11 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.63 | 0.38 | -1.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.93 | 0.78 | -1.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MQ | AFRM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.66 | 0.34 | -1.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.02 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.52 | -0.07 | -0.45 |
Drawdowns
MQ vs. AFRM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MQ drawdown since its inception was -89.71%, smaller than the maximum AFRM drawdown of -94.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MQ and AFRM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MQ | AFRM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.71% | -94.71% | +5.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -44.22% | -53.86% | +9.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.34% | -55.85% | +2.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -94.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -88.36% | -60.68% | -27.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -75.13% | -68.73% | -6.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.82% | 26.61% | +3.21% |
Volatility
MQ vs. AFRM - Volatility Comparison
Marqeta, Inc. (MQ) and Affirm Holdings, Inc. (AFRM) have volatilities of 15.74% and 15.81%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MQ | AFRM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.74% | 15.81% | -0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.53% | 42.81% | -14.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.98% | 60.53% | -18.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 64.87% | 96.29% | -31.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 64.87% | 95.58% | -30.71% |
Dividends
MQ vs. AFRM - Dividend Comparison
Neither MQ nor AFRM has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
MQ vs. AFRM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Marqeta, Inc. and Affirm Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MQ vs. AFRM - Profitability Comparison
MQ - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marqeta, Inc. reported a gross profit of 117.59M and revenue of 165.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 70.9%.
AFRM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Affirm Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 268.03M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
MQ - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marqeta, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.09M and revenue of 165.80M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.3%.
AFRM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Affirm Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 88.43M and revenue of 268.03M, resulting in an operating margin of 33.0%.
MQ - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marqeta, Inc. reported a net income of 7.83M and revenue of 165.80M, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.
AFRM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Affirm Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 102.90M and revenue of 268.03M, resulting in a net margin of 38.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MQ and AFRM have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AFRM has higher volatility (15.81%) compared to MQ (15.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MQ dropped -89.71% vs AFRM's -94.71%.
AFRM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.34 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MQ and AFRM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer