MPWR vs. T
MPWR (Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.) and T (AT&T Inc.) are both stocks. MPWR operates in Semiconductors (Technology), while T operates in Telecom Services (Communication Services). Over the past 10 years, MPWR returned 37.94%/yr vs 3.33%/yr for T. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MPWR vs. T - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MPWR achieves a 74.38% return, which is significantly higher than T's -2.96% return. Over the past 10 years, MPWR has outperformed T with an annualized return of 37.94%, while T has yielded a comparatively lower 3.33% annualized return.
MPWR
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- 1.76%
- YTD
- 74.38%
- 6M
- 67.26%
- 1Y
- 136.15%
- 3Y*
- 44.43%
- 5Y*
- 36.35%
- 10Y*
- 37.94%
T
- 1D
- 2.52%
- 1M
- -1.87%
- YTD
- -2.96%
- 6M
- -1.93%
- 1Y
- -12.71%
- 3Y*
- 20.58%
- 5Y*
- 7.38%
- 10Y*
- 3.33%
MPWR vs. T - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MPWR Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. | 74.38% | 54.45% | -5.55% | 79.78% | -27.78% | 35.49% | 107.49% | 54.80% | 4.49% | 38.23% |
T AT&T Inc. | -2.96% | 13.97% | 44.08% | -2.74% | 5.76% | -8.09% | -21.37% | 45.55% | -22.25% | -4.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between MPWR and T is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2004 | 0.20 |
The correlation between MPWR and T shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MPWR:
$13.89
T:
$3.04
MPWR:
113.54
T:
7.74
MPWR:
1.43
T:
0.32
MPWR:
25.93
T:
1.35
MPWR:
$2.96B
T:
$125.65B
MPWR:
$1.63B
T:
$105.41B
MPWR:
$861.78M
T:
$54.70B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MPWR vs. T — Risk / Return Rank
MPWR
T
MPWR vs. T - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) and AT&T Inc. (T). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MPWR | T | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 0.92 | +0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.43 | -0.59 | +6.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.45 | -1.22 | +15.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MPWR vs. T - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MPWR drawdown since its inception was -72.27%, which is greater than T's maximum drawdown of -64.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MPWR and T.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MPWR | T | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.27% | -64.15% | -8.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.45% | -21.87% | -0.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -51.65% | -21.87% | -29.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.65% | -32.01% | -19.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.65% | -42.35% | -9.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.66% | -18.12% | +11.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.71% | -15.72% | -1.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.44% | 10.64% | -2.20% |
Volatility
MPWR vs. T - Volatility Comparison
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) has a higher volatility of 20.33% compared to AT&T Inc. (T) at 8.21%. This indicates that MPWR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than T based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MPWR | T | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.33% | 8.21% | +12.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.42% | 17.80% | +19.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.53% | 22.13% | +26.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 53.53% | 24.01% | +29.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.23% | 23.73% | +23.50% |
Dividends
MPWR vs. T - Dividend Comparison
MPWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, less than T's 4.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MPWR Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. | 0.42% | 0.69% | 0.85% | 0.63% | 0.85% | 0.49% | 0.55% | 0.90% | 1.03% | 0.71% | 0.98% | 1.26% |
T AT&T Inc. | 4.71% | 4.47% | 4.87% | 6.62% | 6.66% | 8.46% | 7.23% | 5.22% | 7.01% | 5.04% | 4.51% | 5.46% |
Financials
MPWR vs. T - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. and AT&T Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
MPWR and T have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MPWR has higher volatility (20.33%) compared to T (8.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MPWR dropped -72.27% vs T's -64.15%.
MPWR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MPWR and T
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer