MPWR vs. SITM
MPWR (Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.) and SITM (SiTime Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Semiconductors industry within the Technology sector. Over the past 5 years, MPWR returned 36.56%/yr vs 43.34%/yr for SITM. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
MPWR vs. SITM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MPWR achieves a 72.37% return, which is significantly lower than SITM's 88.08% return.
MPWR
- 1D
- 5.28%
- 1M
- -2.60%
- YTD
- 72.37%
- 6M
- 59.11%
- 1Y
- 128.65%
- 3Y*
- 47.03%
- 5Y*
- 36.56%
- 10Y*
- 37.72%
SITM
- 1D
- 6.17%
- 1M
- -20.26%
- YTD
- 88.08%
- 6M
- 83.53%
- 1Y
- 222.72%
- 3Y*
- 81.68%
- 5Y*
- 43.34%
- 10Y*
- —
MPWR vs. SITM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MPWR Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. | 72.37% | 54.45% | -5.55% | 79.78% | -27.78% | 35.49% | 107.49% | 12.11% |
SITM SiTime Corporation | 88.08% | 64.63% | 75.73% | 20.13% | -65.26% | 161.36% | 338.94% | 96.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between MPWR and SITM is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2019 | 0.64 |
The correlation between MPWR and SITM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
MPWR:
$76.78B
SITM:
$17.50B
MPWR:
$13.89
SITM:
-$0.94
MPWR:
25.63
SITM:
45.11
MPWR:
20.88
SITM:
15.10
MPWR:
$2.96B
SITM:
$379.91M
MPWR:
$1.63B
SITM:
$211.60M
MPWR:
$861.78M
SITM:
-$13.71M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MPWR vs. SITM — Risk / Return Rank
MPWR
SITM
MPWR vs. SITM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) and SiTime Corporation (SITM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MPWR | SITM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.40 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.76 | 7.33 | -1.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.40 | 17.94 | -2.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MPWR | SITM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.70 | 2.94 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 0.57 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 1.03 | -0.45 |
Drawdowns
MPWR vs. SITM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MPWR drawdown since its inception was -72.27%, smaller than the maximum SITM drawdown of -78.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MPWR and SITM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MPWR | SITM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.27% | -78.12% | +5.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.45% | -30.59% | +8.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -51.65% | -55.26% | +3.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.65% | -78.12% | +26.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.65% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.73% | -26.31% | +18.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.72% | -36.81% | +19.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.38% | 12.47% | -4.09% |
Volatility
MPWR vs. SITM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) is 19.38%, while SiTime Corporation (SITM) has a volatility of 22.72%. This indicates that MPWR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SITM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MPWR | SITM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.38% | 22.72% | -3.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.53% | 55.94% | -19.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.99% | 76.55% | -28.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 53.40% | 76.29% | -22.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.17% | 80.56% | -33.39% |
Dividends
MPWR vs. SITM - Dividend Comparison
MPWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, while SITM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MPWR Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. | 0.43% | 0.69% | 0.85% | 0.63% | 0.85% | 0.49% | 0.55% | 0.90% | 1.03% | 0.71% | 0.98% | 1.26% |
SITM SiTime Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
MPWR vs. SITM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. and SiTime Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MPWR vs. SITM - Profitability Comparison
MPWR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. reported a gross profit of 445.07M and revenue of 804.19M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.3%.
SITM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SiTime Corporation reported a gross profit of 66.96M and revenue of 113.57M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.0%.
MPWR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. reported an operating income of 241.15M and revenue of 804.19M, resulting in an operating margin of 30.0%.
SITM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SiTime Corporation reported an operating income of -12.34M and revenue of 113.57M, resulting in an operating margin of -10.9%.
MPWR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. reported a net income of 193.23M and revenue of 804.19M, resulting in a net margin of 24.0%.
SITM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SiTime Corporation reported a net income of -5.22M and revenue of 113.57M, resulting in a net margin of -4.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MPWR and SITM have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SITM has higher volatility (22.72%) compared to MPWR (19.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MPWR dropped -72.27% vs SITM's -78.12%.
SITM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 2.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MPWR and SITM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer