MPWR vs. SBS
MPWR (Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.) and SBS (Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP) are both stocks. MPWR operates in Semiconductors (Technology), while SBS operates in Utilities - Regulated Water (Utilities). Over the past 10 years, MPWR returned 37.94%/yr vs 16.43%/yr for SBS. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MPWR vs. SBS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MPWR achieves a 74.38% return, which is significantly higher than SBS's 15.28% return. Over the past 10 years, MPWR has outperformed SBS with an annualized return of 37.94%, while SBS has yielded a comparatively lower 16.43% annualized return.
MPWR
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- -4.43%
- YTD
- 74.38%
- 6M
- 67.26%
- 1Y
- 121.18%
- 3Y*
- 44.43%
- 5Y*
- 36.35%
- 10Y*
- 37.94%
SBS
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -6.98%
- YTD
- 15.28%
- 6M
- 14.60%
- 1Y
- 38.40%
- 3Y*
- 40.12%
- 5Y*
- 32.68%
- 10Y*
- 16.43%
MPWR vs. SBS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MPWR Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. | 74.38% | 54.45% | -5.55% | 79.78% | -27.78% | 35.49% | 107.49% | 54.80% | 4.49% | 38.23% |
SBS Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP | 15.28% | 80.60% | -4.21% | 46.89% | 48.42% | -13.79% | -40.98% | 91.22% | -20.37% | 23.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between MPWR and SBS is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2004 | 0.25 |
The correlation between MPWR and SBS shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (3 years) to 0.33 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MPWR:
$77.67B
SBS:
$19.24B
MPWR:
$13.89
SBS:
R$2.48
MPWR:
113.54
SBS:
11.24
MPWR:
1.43
SBS:
0.22
MPWR:
25.93
SBS:
2.48
MPWR:
21.12
SBS:
2.27
MPWR:
$2.96B
SBS:
R$38.70B
MPWR:
$1.63B
SBS:
R$13.96B
MPWR:
$861.78M
SBS:
R$14.87B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MPWR vs. SBS — Risk / Return Rank
MPWR
SBS
MPWR vs. SBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) and Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP (SBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MPWR | SBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.21 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.43 | 1.55 | +3.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.45 | 4.65 | +9.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MPWR vs. SBS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MPWR drawdown since its inception was -72.27%, smaller than the maximum SBS drawdown of -76.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MPWR and SBS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MPWR | SBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.27% | -76.49% | +4.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.45% | -24.88% | +2.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -51.65% | -24.88% | -26.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.65% | -30.35% | -21.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.65% | -61.91% | +10.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.66% | -22.90% | +16.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.71% | -25.70% | +7.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.44% | 8.28% | +0.16% |
Volatility
MPWR vs. SBS - Volatility Comparison
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) has a higher volatility of 20.33% compared to Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP (SBS) at 8.92%. This indicates that MPWR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SBS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MPWR | SBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.33% | 8.92% | +11.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.42% | 24.61% | +12.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.53% | 33.86% | +14.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 53.53% | 36.90% | +16.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.23% | 43.51% | +3.72% |
Dividends
MPWR vs. SBS - Dividend Comparison
MPWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, less than SBS's 2.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MPWR Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. | 0.42% | 0.69% | 0.85% | 0.63% | 0.85% | 0.49% | 0.55% | 0.90% | 1.03% | 0.71% | 0.98% | 1.26% |
SBS Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP | 2.33% | 4.68% | 1.96% | 1.66% | 1.88% | 0.97% | 2.93% | 1.99% | 3.86% | 2.76% | 0.65% | 1.91% |
Financials
MPWR vs. SBS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. and Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MPWR vs. SBS - Profitability Comparison
MPWR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. reported a gross profit of 445.07M and revenue of 804.19M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.3%.
SBS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP reported a gross profit of 3.79B and revenue of 9.78B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.8%.
MPWR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. reported an operating income of 241.15M and revenue of 804.19M, resulting in an operating margin of 30.0%.
SBS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP reported an operating income of 3.33B and revenue of 9.78B, resulting in an operating margin of 34.1%.
MPWR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. reported a net income of 193.23M and revenue of 804.19M, resulting in a net margin of 24.0%.
SBS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP reported a net income of 1.72B and revenue of 9.78B, resulting in a net margin of 17.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MPWR and SBS have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MPWR has higher volatility (20.33%) compared to SBS (8.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MPWR dropped -72.27% vs SBS's -76.49%.
MPWR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MPWR and SBS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer