MPSSX vs. DAGVX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

MPSSX (BNY Mellon Small Cap Multi-Strategy Fund) and DAGVX (BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund) are both mutual funds - MPSSX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by BNY Mellon, while DAGVX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by BNY Mellon. Over the past 10 years, MPSSX returned 9.62%/yr vs 13.76%/yr for DAGVX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MPSSX charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.93%/yr for DAGVX.

Performance

MPSSX vs. DAGVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Small Cap Multi-Strategy Fund (MPSSX) and BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund (DAGVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MPSSX achieves a 19.11% return, which is significantly higher than DAGVX's 15.01% return. Over the past 10 years, MPSSX has underperformed DAGVX with an annualized return of 9.62%, while DAGVX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.76% annualized return.

MPSSX

• 1D: 2.36%
• 1M: 5.43%
• YTD: 19.11%
• 6M: 15.92%
• 1Y: 33.25%
• 3Y*: 13.90%
• 5Y*: 5.45%
• 10Y*: 9.62%

DAGVX

• 1D: 0.36%
• 1M: 2.05%
• YTD: 15.01%
• 6M: 14.15%
• 1Y: 29.43%
• 3Y*: 18.92%
• 5Y*: 14.53%
• 10Y*: 13.76%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MPSSX vs. DAGVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MPSSX BNY Mellon Small Cap Multi-Strategy Fund	19.11%	11.99%	7.16%	9.32%	-18.37%	11.50%	30.67%	26.22%	-23.20%	18.40%
DAGVX BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund	15.01%	18.20%	14.16%	12.54%	1.43%	30.90%	3.66%	26.74%	-10.76%	14.78%

Correlation

The correlation between MPSSX and DAGVX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2000	0.86

The correlation between MPSSX and DAGVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MPSSX vs. DAGVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MPSSX

MPSSX Risk / Return Rank: 44
MPSSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
MPSSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
MPSSX Omega Ratio Rank: 37
MPSSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
MPSSX Martin Ratio Rank: 51

DAGVX

DAGVX Risk / Return Rank: 82
DAGVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
DAGVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
DAGVX Omega Ratio Rank: 71
DAGVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
DAGVX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MPSSX vs. DAGVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Small Cap Multi-Strategy Fund (MPSSX) and BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund (DAGVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MPSSX	DAGVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.74	2.42	-0.68
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.51	3.36	-0.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.43	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.56	4.46	-1.91
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.81	16.34	-6.53

MPSSX vs. DAGVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MPSSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is comparable to the DAGVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MPSSX and DAGVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MPSSX vs. DAGVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MPSSX drawdown since its inception was -58.11%, which is greater than DAGVX's maximum drawdown of -55.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MPSSX and DAGVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MPSSX	DAGVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.11%	-55.04%	-3.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.06%	-6.69%	-6.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.78%	-16.96%	-8.82%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.76%	-16.96%	-13.80%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.66%	-42.62%	-5.04%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.80%	+0.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.23%	-7.64%	-4.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.40%	1.82%	+1.58%

Volatility

MPSSX vs. DAGVX - Volatility Comparison

BNY Mellon Small Cap Multi-Strategy Fund (MPSSX) has a higher volatility of 6.17% compared to BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund (DAGVX) at 4.38%. This indicates that MPSSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DAGVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MPSSX	DAGVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.17%	4.38%	+1.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.50%	9.56%	+4.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.22%	12.32%	+6.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.88%	15.61%	+6.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.02%	18.85%	+4.17%

MPSSX vs. DAGVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MPSSX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than DAGVX's 0.93% expense ratio.

Dividends

MPSSX vs. DAGVX - Dividend Comparison

MPSSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 35.48%, more than DAGVX's 5.81% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DAGVX BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund	5.81%	6.69%	6.85%	5.09%	7.96%	21.64%	2.64%	3.29%	17.81%	10.71%	2.72%	15.78%
MPSSX BNY Mellon Small Cap Multi-Strategy Fund	35.48%	42.26%	9.22%	0.54%	2.77%	12.65%	0.61%	3.32%	4.06%	8.49%	0.53%	4.03%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MPSSX and DAGVX in my portfolio?

MPSSX and DAGVX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MPSSX or DAGVX?

MPSSX has higher volatility (6.17%) compared to DAGVX (4.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MPSSX dropped -58.11% vs DAGVX's -55.04%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DAGVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.