MPRO vs. FFUT

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

MPRO (Monarch ProCap ETF) and FFUT (Fidelity Managed Futures ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MPRO is a Diversified Portfolio fund tracking the Monarch ProCap Index, while FFUT is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by Fidelity. MPRO is passively managed, while FFUT is actively managed. Over the past year, MPRO returned 13.01% vs 18.91% for FFUT. At a correlation of -0.11, they often move in opposite directions. MPRO charges 1.17%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FFUT.

Performance

MPRO vs. FFUT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Monarch ProCap ETF (MPRO) and Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MPRO achieves a 6.22% return, which is significantly lower than FFUT's 9.23% return.

MPRO

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: 0.09%
• YTD: 6.22%
• 6M: 6.18%
• 1Y: 13.01%
• 3Y*: 9.90%
• 5Y*: 5.68%
• 10Y*: —

FFUT

• 1D: -0.52%
• 1M: -2.34%
• YTD: 9.23%
• 6M: 9.36%
• 1Y: 18.91%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MPRO vs. FFUT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MPRO Monarch ProCap ETF	6.22%	6.47%
FFUT Fidelity Managed Futures ETF	9.23%	8.58%

Correlation

The correlation between MPRO and FFUT is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025	-0.11

Return for Risk

MPRO vs. FFUT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MPRO

MPRO Risk / Return Rank: 56
MPRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
MPRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
MPRO Omega Ratio Rank: 58
MPRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
MPRO Martin Ratio Rank: 54

FFUT

FFUT Risk / Return Rank: 64
FFUT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
FFUT Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
FFUT Omega Ratio Rank: 54
FFUT Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
FFUT Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MPRO vs. FFUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monarch ProCap ETF (MPRO) and Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MPRO	FFUT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.92	1.69	+0.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.83	2.42	+0.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.33	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.30	4.77	-2.46
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.07	15.04	-5.97

MPRO vs. FFUT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MPRO Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the FFUT Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MPRO and FFUT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MPRO vs. FFUT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MPRO drawdown since its inception was -14.51%, which is greater than FFUT's maximum drawdown of -3.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MPRO and FFUT.

Drawdown Indicators

	MPRO	FFUT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.51%	-3.98%	-10.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.67%	-3.98%	-1.69%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.64%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.51%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.98%	-3.98%	+3.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.43%	-0.94%	-2.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.44%	1.26%	+0.18%

Volatility

MPRO vs. FFUT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Monarch ProCap ETF (MPRO) is 2.04%, while Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT) has a volatility of 2.92%. This indicates that MPRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFUT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MPRO	FFUT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.04%	2.92%	-0.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.15%	8.96%	-3.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.81%	11.23%	-4.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.28%	11.03%	-1.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.22%	11.03%	-1.81%

MPRO vs. FFUT - Expense Ratio Comparison

MPRO has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than FFUT's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

MPRO vs. FFUT - Dividend Comparison

MPRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, less than FFUT's 1.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FFUT Fidelity Managed Futures ETF	1.91%	2.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MPRO Monarch ProCap ETF	1.87%	1.93%	1.64%	1.40%	1.09%	0.95%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MPRO and FFUT in my portfolio?

MPRO and FFUT have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MPRO or FFUT?

FFUT has higher volatility (2.92%) compared to MPRO (2.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MPRO dropped -14.51% vs FFUT's -3.98%.

Which ETF is better, MPRO or FFUT?

On 1-year performance, FFUT leads with 18.91% vs 13.01% for MPRO. On fees, FFUT is cheaper at 0.80% per year. On volatility, MPRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MPRO or FFUT?

Over the 1-year period, FFUT has performed better with a 18.91% return vs 13.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MPRO or FFUT?

FFUT is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for MPRO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MPRO or FFUT?

FFUT has the higher dividend yield at 1.91%, compared with 1.87% for MPRO.

What is the main difference between MPRO and FFUT?

MPRO is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while FFUT is Systematic Trend. They also come from different issuers: Monarch and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 1.17% for MPRO and 0.80% for FFUT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MPRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.