PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MPNGY vs. FXI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MPNGY vs. FXI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Meituan ADR (MPNGY) and iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MPNGY achieves a -10.08% return, which is significantly lower than FXI's -3.96% return.


MPNGY

1D
-0.29%
1M
31.25%
6M
-3.89%
YTD
-10.08%
1Y
-22.95%
3Y*
-13.68%
5Y*
-15.56%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-0.19%

FXI

1D
-0.05%
1M
14.38%
6M
-7.16%
YTD
-3.96%
1Y
0.93%
3Y*
9.88%
5Y*
0.26%
10Y*
2.81%
ALL TIME*
5.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$773.89M$798.32M$975.73M
$3.54M$4.66M$6.35M

MPNGY vs. FXI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
MPNGY
Meituan ADR
-10.08%-32.00%84.72%-52.51%-23.47%-22.79%189.35%7.62%
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
-3.96%28.95%28.98%-12.42%-20.66%-20.06%8.92%5.84%

Correlation

The correlation between MPNGY and FXI is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2019

0.77

The correlation between MPNGY and FXI shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.79 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MPNGY vs. FXI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MPNGY
MPNGY Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
MPNGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MPNGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
MPNGY Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
MPNGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
MPNGY Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

FXI
FXI Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
FXI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXI Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
FXI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXI Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MPNGY vs. FXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Meituan ADR (MPNGY) and iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MPNGYFXIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

1.01

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.47

-0.03

-0.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.79

-0.07

-0.72

MPNGY vs. FXI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MPNGY Sharpe Ratio is -0.54, which is lower than the FXI Sharpe Ratio of -0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MPNGY and FXI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MPNGY vs. FXI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MPNGY drawdown since its inception was -86.40%, which is greater than FXI's maximum drawdown of -72.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MPNGY and FXI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MPNGYFXIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.40%

-72.68%

-13.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-48.50%

-22.94%

-25.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-70.63%

-25.56%

-45.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-79.07%

-49.88%

-29.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-79.62%

-24.37%

-55.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-54.80%

-31.21%

-23.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.62%

10.00%

+18.62%

Volatility

MPNGY vs. FXI - Volatility Comparison

Meituan ADR (MPNGY) has a higher volatility of 11.10% compared to iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) at 5.14%. This indicates that MPNGY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FXI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MPNGYFXIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.10%

5.14%

+5.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.14%

14.61%

+19.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.35%

20.32%

+22.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

60.70%

31.44%

+29.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

60.70%

27.60%

+33.10%

Dividends

MPNGY vs. FXI - Dividend Comparison

MPNGY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
1.86%2.42%1.76%3.17%2.61%1.60%2.19%2.74%2.69%2.31%2.69%2.90%
MPNGY
Meituan ADR
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MPNGY and FXI have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MPNGY has higher volatility (11.10%) compared to FXI (5.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MPNGY dropped -86.40% vs FXI's -72.68%.

FXI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.04 vs -0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MPNGY and FXI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer