MPNGY vs. TCEHY

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Meituan ADR (MPNGY) and Tencent Holdings Limited (TCEHY).

Performance

MPNGY vs. TCEHY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Meituan ADR (MPNGY) and Tencent Holdings Limited (TCEHY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MPNGY vs. TCEHY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
MPNGY Meituan ADR	-17.09%	-32.00%	84.72%	-52.51%	-23.47%	-22.79%	189.35%	2.52%
TCEHY Tencent Holdings Limited	-17.41%	45.23%	41.92%	-5.48%	-24.97%	-18.69%	50.09%	14.39%

Fundamentals

Market Cap MPNGY : $66.31B TCEHY : $586.89B
EPS MPNGY : -$7.55 TCEHY : $24.17
PS Ratio MPNGY : 0.18 TCEHY : 0.78
PB Ratio MPNGY : 0.44 TCEHY : 0.51
Total Revenue (TTM) MPNGY : $363.10B TCEHY : $748.08B
Gross Profit (TTM) MPNGY : $110.56B TCEHY : $416.51B
EBITDA (TTM) MPNGY : -$19.51B TCEHY : $308.68B

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with MPNGY having a -17.09% return and TCEHY slightly lower at -17.41%.

MPNGY

• 1D: 2.00%
• 1M: 6.42%
• YTD: -17.09%
• 6M: -17.99%
• 1Y: -45.76%
• 3Y*: -15.47%
• 5Y*: -23.40%
• 10Y*: —

TCEHY

• 1D: 3.59%
• 1M: -3.77%
• YTD: -17.41%
• 6M: -25.75%
• 1Y: -0.09%
• 3Y*: 9.83%
• 5Y*: -3.39%
• 10Y*: 13.31%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

MPNGY vs. TCEHY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MPNGY

MPNGY Risk / Return Rank: 7
MPNGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
MPNGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
MPNGY Omega Ratio Rank: 6
MPNGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
MPNGY Martin Ratio Rank: 12

TCEHY

TCEHY Risk / Return Rank: 39
TCEHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
TCEHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
TCEHY Omega Ratio Rank: 36
TCEHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
TCEHY Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MPNGY vs. TCEHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Meituan ADR (MPNGY) and Tencent Holdings Limited (TCEHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MPNGY	TCEHY	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-1.08	-0.00	-1.08
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.75	0.23	-1.98
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.80	1.03	-0.23
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.86	-0.06	-0.80
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.42	-0.18	-1.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MPNGY vs. TCEHY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MPNGY Sharpe Ratio is -1.08, which is lower than the TCEHY Sharpe Ratio of -0.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MPNGY and TCEHY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MPNGY	TCEHY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.08	-0.00	-1.08
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.38	-0.08	-0.30
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.35	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.04	0.67	-0.70

Correlation

The correlation between MPNGY and TCEHY is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

MPNGY vs. TCEHY - Dividend Comparison

MPNGY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TCEHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MPNGY Meituan ADR	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TCEHY Tencent Holdings Limited	0.92%	0.76%	0.82%	6.67%	4.15%	0.35%	0.19%	0.23%	0.26%	0.29%	0.51%	0.21%

Drawdowns

MPNGY vs. TCEHY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MPNGY drawdown since its inception was -86.40%, which is greater than TCEHY's maximum drawdown of -73.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MPNGY and TCEHY.

Drawdown Indicators

	MPNGY	TCEHY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-86.40%	-73.17%	-13.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-53.70%	-30.12%	-23.58%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-81.43%	-68.59%	-12.84%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-73.17%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-81.21%	-28.80%	-52.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-53.40%	-19.54%	-33.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	32.72%	11.01%	+21.71%

Volatility

MPNGY vs. TCEHY - Volatility Comparison

Meituan ADR (MPNGY) has a higher volatility of 17.71% compared to Tencent Holdings Limited (TCEHY) at 15.10%. This indicates that MPNGY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TCEHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MPNGY	TCEHY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.71%	15.10%	+2.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.31%	22.50%	+4.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	42.55%	31.79%	+10.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	61.98%	43.24%	+18.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	61.29%	38.71%	+22.58%

Financials

MPNGY vs. TCEHY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Meituan ADR and Tencent Holdings Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

MPNGY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Meituan ADR reported a gross profit of 22.68B and revenue of 89.71B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.3%.

TCEHY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Tencent Holdings Limited reported a gross profit of 106.79B and revenue of 191.69B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.7%.

MPNGY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Meituan ADR reported an operating income of -18.03B and revenue of 89.71B, resulting in an operating margin of -20.1%.

TCEHY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Tencent Holdings Limited reported an operating income of 58.21B and revenue of 191.69B, resulting in an operating margin of 30.4%.

MPNGY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Meituan ADR reported a net income of -14.94B and revenue of 89.71B, resulting in a net margin of -16.7%.

TCEHY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Tencent Holdings Limited reported a net income of 57.46B and revenue of 191.69B, resulting in a net margin of 30.0%.