MPNGY vs. TCEHY

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

MPNGY (Meituan ADR) and TCEHY (Tencent Holdings Limited) are both stocks. MPNGY operates in Internet Retail (Consumer Cyclical), while TCEHY operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services). Over the past 5 years, MPNGY returned -22.73%/yr vs -2.81%/yr for TCEHY. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

MPNGY vs. TCEHY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Meituan ADR (MPNGY) and Tencent Holdings Limited (TCEHY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MPNGY achieves a -18.64% return, which is significantly higher than TCEHY's -20.27% return.

MPNGY

• 1D: 6.55%
• 1M: -0.88%
• YTD: -18.64%
• 6M: -12.87%
• 1Y: -38.39%
• 3Y*: -11.69%
• 5Y*: -22.73%
• 10Y*: —

TCEHY

• 1D: 9.10%
• 1M: -0.27%
• YTD: -20.27%
• 6M: -22.90%
• 1Y: -4.93%
• 3Y*: 13.21%
• 5Y*: -2.81%
• 10Y*: 12.08%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MPNGY vs. TCEHY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
MPNGY Meituan ADR	-18.64%	-32.00%	84.72%	-52.51%	-23.47%	-22.79%	189.35%	2.52%
TCEHY Tencent Holdings Limited	-20.27%	45.23%	41.92%	-5.48%	-24.97%	-18.69%	50.09%	14.39%

Correlation

The correlation between MPNGY and TCEHY is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.66
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2019	0.68

The correlation between MPNGY and TCEHY shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.70 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap MPNGY : $65.61B TCEHY : $553.41B
EPS MPNGY : -$13.06 TCEHY : $25.30
PS Ratio MPNGY : 0.18 TCEHY : 0.73
PB Ratio MPNGY : 0.44 TCEHY : 0.49
Total Revenue (TTM) MPNGY : $367.03B TCEHY : $763.32B
Gross Profit (TTM) MPNGY : $103.96B TCEHY : $422.60B
EBITDA (TTM) MPNGY : -$36.06B TCEHY : $324.78B

Return for Risk

MPNGY vs. TCEHY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MPNGY

MPNGY Risk / Return Rank: 9
MPNGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
MPNGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
MPNGY Omega Ratio Rank: 8
MPNGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
MPNGY Martin Ratio Rank: 15

TCEHY

TCEHY Risk / Return Rank: 33
TCEHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
TCEHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
TCEHY Omega Ratio Rank: 29
TCEHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
TCEHY Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MPNGY vs. TCEHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Meituan ADR (MPNGY) and Tencent Holdings Limited (TCEHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MPNGY	TCEHY	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.93	-0.16	-0.77
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.44	-0.02	-1.41
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.84	1.00	-0.16
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.76	-0.08	-0.68
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.14	-0.17	-0.97
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MPNGY vs. TCEHY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MPNGY Sharpe Ratio is -0.93, which is lower than the TCEHY Sharpe Ratio of -0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MPNGY and TCEHY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MPNGY	TCEHY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.93	-0.16	-0.77
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.37	-0.07	-0.31
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.31	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.04	0.65	-0.69

Drawdowns

MPNGY vs. TCEHY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MPNGY drawdown since its inception was -86.40%, which is greater than TCEHY's maximum drawdown of -73.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MPNGY and TCEHY.

Drawdown Indicators

	MPNGY	TCEHY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-86.40%	-73.17%	-13.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-50.12%	-36.75%	-13.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-66.89%	-36.75%	-30.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-81.43%	-66.67%	-14.76%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-73.17%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-81.56%	-31.26%	-50.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-54.14%	-19.66%	-34.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	33.35%	16.42%	+16.93%

Volatility

MPNGY vs. TCEHY - Volatility Comparison

Meituan ADR (MPNGY) has a higher volatility of 17.69% compared to Tencent Holdings Limited (TCEHY) at 12.23%. This indicates that MPNGY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TCEHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MPNGY	TCEHY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.69%	12.23%	+5.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.65%	24.21%	+7.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	41.41%	30.62%	+10.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	61.64%	43.23%	+18.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	61.08%	38.83%	+22.25%

Dividends

MPNGY vs. TCEHY - Dividend Comparison

MPNGY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TCEHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MPNGY Meituan ADR	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TCEHY Tencent Holdings Limited	1.12%	0.76%	0.82%	6.67%	4.15%	0.35%	0.19%	0.23%	0.26%	0.29%	0.51%	0.21%

Financials

MPNGY vs. TCEHY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Meituan ADR and Tencent Holdings Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

MPNGY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meituan ADR reported a gross profit of 25.81B and revenue of 90.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.5%.

TCEHY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tencent Holdings Limited reported a gross profit of 106.58B and revenue of 195.27B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 54.6%.

MPNGY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meituan ADR reported an operating income of -7.42B and revenue of 90.49B, resulting in an operating margin of -8.2%.

TCEHY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tencent Holdings Limited reported an operating income of 65.72B and revenue of 195.27B, resulting in an operating margin of 33.7%.

MPNGY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meituan ADR reported a net income of -6.79B and revenue of 90.49B, resulting in a net margin of -7.5%.

TCEHY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tencent Holdings Limited reported a net income of 57.74B and revenue of 195.27B, resulting in a net margin of 29.6%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MPNGY and TCEHY in my portfolio?

MPNGY and TCEHY have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MPNGY or TCEHY?

MPNGY has higher volatility (17.69%) compared to TCEHY (12.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MPNGY dropped -86.40% vs TCEHY's -73.17%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TCEHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.16 vs -0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.