PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MPL vs. RTXG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MPL vs. RTXG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MP ETF (MPL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long RTX Daily ETF (RTXG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


MPL

1D
-19.06%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RTXG

1D
1.76%
1M
4.14%
YTD
-8.74%
6M
4.28%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MPL vs. RTXG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MPL and RTXG is -0.43, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2026

-0.43

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MPL vs. RTXG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MP ETF (MPL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long RTX Daily ETF (RTXG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MPL vs. RTXG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MPLRTXGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.59

0.97

-1.55

Drawdowns

MPL vs. RTXG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MPL drawdown since its inception was -34.06%, smaller than the maximum RTXG drawdown of -37.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MPL and RTXG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MPLRTXGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.06%

-37.49%

+3.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.06%

-30.24%

-3.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.74%

-8.84%

-0.90%

Volatility

MPL vs. RTXG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MPLRTXGDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

182.07%

49.05%

+133.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

182.07%

49.05%

+133.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

182.07%

49.05%

+133.02%

MPL vs. RTXG - Expense Ratio Comparison

MPL has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than RTXG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

MPL vs. RTXG - Dividend Comparison

MPL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RTXG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.97%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MPL and RTXG have a correlation of -0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, RTXG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

RTXG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for MPL.

RTXG has the higher dividend yield at 6.97%, compared with 0.00% for MPL.

They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for MPL and 0.75% for RTXG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MPL and RTXG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer