MPL vs. QTAP
MPL (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MP ETF) and QTAP (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MPL charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTAP.
Performance
MPL vs. QTAP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MPL
- 1D
- -7.21%
- 1M
- -36.07%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QTAP
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -1.16%
- YTD
- 13.00%
- 6M
- 12.86%
- 1Y
- 21.15%
- 3Y*
- 19.70%
- 5Y*
- 12.71%
- 10Y*
- —
MPL vs. QTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MPL Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MP ETF | -36.50% |
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April | -0.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between MPL and QTAP is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2026 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MPL vs. QTAP — Risk / Return Rank
MPL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QTAP
MPL vs. QTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MP ETF (MPL) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MPL | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.88 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 8.53 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 46.27 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MPL vs. QTAP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MPL drawdown since its inception was -47.44%, which is greater than QTAP's maximum drawdown of -29.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MPL and QTAP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MPL | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.44% | -29.44% | -18.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.44% | -1.55% | -45.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.24% | -4.99% | -22.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.46% | — |
Volatility
MPL vs. QTAP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MPL | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.01% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 4.95% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 140.24% | 6.06% | +134.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 140.24% | 18.91% | +121.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 140.24% | 18.70% | +121.54% |
MPL vs. QTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison
MPL has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than QTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
MPL vs. QTAP - Dividend Comparison
Neither MPL nor QTAP has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
MPL and QTAP have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QTAP is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QTAP is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for MPL.
MPL and QTAP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for MPL and 0.79% for QTAP.
Find the right allocation for MPL and QTAP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer