PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MPHQX vs. MCFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MPHQX vs. MCFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Total Return Fund Class K (MPHQX) and Mercer Core Fixed Income Fund (MCFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MPHQX achieves a -0.40% return, which is significantly higher than MCFIX's -2.44% return.


MPHQX

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.51%
6M
-0.86%
YTD
-0.40%
1Y
2.63%
3Y*
4.17%
5Y*
-0.13%
10Y*
1.88%
ALL TIME*
2.57%

MCFIX

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.25%
6M
-2.33%
YTD
-2.44%
1Y
0.03%
3Y*
3.26%
5Y*
-0.73%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
0.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MPHQX vs. MCFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
MPHQX
BlackRock Total Return Fund Class K
-0.40%8.21%1.92%6.04%-14.14%-0.68%9.10%6.46%
MCFIX
Mercer Core Fixed Income Fund
-2.44%6.64%2.02%6.47%-13.69%-1.05%4.75%3.31%

Correlation

The correlation between MPHQX and MCFIX is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2019

0.88

The correlation between MPHQX and MCFIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MPHQX vs. MCFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MPHQX
MPHQX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
MPHQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MPHQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
MPHQX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
MPHQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
MPHQX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

MCFIX
MCFIX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
MCFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MCFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
MCFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
MCFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
MCFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MPHQX vs. MCFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Total Return Fund Class K (MPHQX) and Mercer Core Fixed Income Fund (MCFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MPHQXMCFIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.00

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.91

0.01

+0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.06

0.02

+2.04

MPHQX vs. MCFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MPHQX Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is higher than the MCFIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MPHQX and MCFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MPHQX vs. MCFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MPHQX drawdown since its inception was -21.68%, roughly equal to the maximum MCFIX drawdown of -21.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MPHQX and MCFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MPHQXMCFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.68%

-21.68%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.28%

-4.08%

-0.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.79%

-5.27%

-0.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.28%

-18.72%

-0.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.51%

-7.35%

+3.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.79%

-8.49%

+4.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.89%

1.72%

+0.17%

Volatility

MPHQX vs. MCFIX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Total Return Fund Class K (MPHQX) and Mercer Core Fixed Income Fund (MCFIX) have volatilities of 1.00% and 1.03%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MPHQXMCFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.00%

1.03%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.69%

2.93%

+0.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.60%

4.01%

+0.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.30%

6.05%

+0.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.15%

6.07%

-0.92%

MPHQX vs. MCFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MPHQX has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is higher than MCFIX's 0.16% expense ratio.


Dividends

MPHQX vs. MCFIX - Dividend Comparison

MPHQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.42%, more than MCFIX's 4.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MCFIX
Mercer Core Fixed Income Fund
4.37%3.89%4.54%3.68%3.31%2.45%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MPHQX
BlackRock Total Return Fund Class K
4.42%4.89%5.01%4.19%3.09%2.58%6.30%3.24%3.40%3.21%2.89%3.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


MPHQX and MCFIX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MCFIX has higher volatility (1.03%) compared to MPHQX (1.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MPHQX dropped -21.68% vs MCFIX's -21.68%.

MPHQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.85 vs 0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MPHQX and MCFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer