MPHQX vs. TIBDX

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

MPHQX (BlackRock Total Return Fund Class K) and TIBDX (TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Over the past 10 years, MPHQX returned 2.21%/yr vs 1.99%/yr for TIBDX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MPHQX charges 0.37%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for TIBDX.

Performance

MPHQX vs. TIBDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Total Return Fund Class K (MPHQX) and TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund (TIBDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MPHQX achieves a 0.76% return, which is significantly higher than TIBDX's 0.56% return. Over the past 10 years, MPHQX has outperformed TIBDX with an annualized return of 2.21%, while TIBDX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.99% annualized return.

MPHQX

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 0.38%
• YTD: 0.76%
• 6M: 1.16%
• 1Y: 6.81%
• 3Y*: 4.55%
• 5Y*: 0.40%
• 10Y*: 2.21%

TIBDX

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 0.05%
• YTD: 0.56%
• 6M: 0.93%
• 1Y: 6.03%
• 3Y*: 4.29%
• 5Y*: 0.18%
• 10Y*: 1.99%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MPHQX vs. TIBDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MPHQX BlackRock Total Return Fund Class K	0.76%	8.21%	1.92%	6.04%	-14.14%	-0.68%	9.10%	9.91%	-0.81%	4.33%
TIBDX TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund	0.56%	7.38%	1.95%	5.63%	-13.68%	-0.95%	8.10%	9.57%	-0.64%	4.48%

Correlation

The correlation between MPHQX and TIBDX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2001	0.90

The correlation between MPHQX and TIBDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MPHQX vs. TIBDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MPHQX

MPHQX Risk / Return Rank: 20
MPHQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
MPHQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
MPHQX Omega Ratio Rank: 25
MPHQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
MPHQX Martin Ratio Rank: 14

TIBDX

TIBDX Risk / Return Rank: 26
TIBDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
TIBDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
TIBDX Omega Ratio Rank: 26
TIBDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
TIBDX Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MPHQX vs. TIBDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Total Return Fund Class K (MPHQX) and TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund (TIBDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MPHQX	TIBDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.32	1.39	-0.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.84	2.07	-0.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.25	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.42	1.80	-0.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.82	5.59	-1.77
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MPHQX vs. TIBDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MPHQX Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is comparable to the TIBDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MPHQX and TIBDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MPHQX	TIBDX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.32	1.39	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.06	0.03	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.43	0.42	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.34	0.95	-0.61

Drawdowns

MPHQX vs. TIBDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MPHQX drawdown since its inception was -21.68%, which is greater than TIBDX's maximum drawdown of -18.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MPHQX and TIBDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MPHQX	TIBDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.68%	-18.82%	-2.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.28%	-2.98%	-1.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.86%	-6.29%	-0.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.28%	-18.82%	-0.46%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-19.28%	-18.82%	-0.46%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.39%	-1.32%	-1.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.79%	-2.30%	-1.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.59%	0.96%	+0.63%

Volatility

MPHQX vs. TIBDX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Total Return Fund Class K (MPHQX) and TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund (TIBDX) have volatilities of 1.33% and 1.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MPHQX	TIBDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.33%	1.32%	+0.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.53%	2.85%	+0.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.64%	3.90%	+0.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.27%	5.63%	+0.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.14%	4.73%	+0.41%

MPHQX vs. TIBDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MPHQX has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is higher than TIBDX's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

MPHQX vs. TIBDX - Dividend Comparison

MPHQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.78%, more than TIBDX's 4.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MPHQX BlackRock Total Return Fund Class K	4.78%	4.89%	5.01%	4.19%	3.09%	2.58%	6.30%	3.24%	3.40%	3.21%	2.89%	3.49%
TIBDX TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund	4.45%	4.34%	3.60%	3.22%	2.44%	2.39%	4.45%	3.09%	2.88%	2.93%	3.80%	4.68%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MPHQX and TIBDX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, MPHQX and TIBDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, MPHQX or TIBDX?

MPHQX has higher volatility (1.33%) compared to TIBDX (1.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MPHQX dropped -21.68% vs TIBDX's -18.82%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TIBDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.