PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MPGVX vs. UCEQX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MPGVX vs. UCEQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mondrian Global Equity Value Fund (MPGVX) and USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund (UCEQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MPGVX achieves a 10.43% return, which is significantly lower than UCEQX's 15.47% return.


MPGVX

1D
0.73%
1M
4.93%
6M
6.24%
YTD
10.43%
1Y
20.66%
3Y*
16.66%
5Y*
10.08%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.14%

UCEQX

1D
0.94%
1M
1.93%
6M
11.57%
YTD
15.47%
1Y
26.86%
3Y*
20.44%
5Y*
11.16%
10Y*
11.37%
ALL TIME*
10.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MPGVX vs. UCEQX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
MPGVX
Mondrian Global Equity Value Fund
10.43%28.63%2.87%22.43%-9.49%10.90%18.10%
UCEQX
USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund
15.47%23.71%14.50%19.36%-16.25%19.68%23.67%

Correlation

The correlation between MPGVX and UCEQX is 0.81, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2020

0.87

The correlation between MPGVX and UCEQX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MPGVX vs. UCEQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MPGVX
MPGVX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
MPGVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MPGVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
MPGVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
MPGVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
MPGVX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

UCEQX
UCEQX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
UCEQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UCEQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
UCEQX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
UCEQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
UCEQX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MPGVX vs. UCEQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mondrian Global Equity Value Fund (MPGVX) and USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund (UCEQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MPGVXUCEQXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.39

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

3.22

-1.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.99

13.86

-5.87

MPGVX vs. UCEQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MPGVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is comparable to the UCEQX Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MPGVX and UCEQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MPGVX vs. UCEQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MPGVX drawdown since its inception was -22.83%, smaller than the maximum UCEQX drawdown of -35.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MPGVX and UCEQX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MPGVXUCEQXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.83%

-35.33%

+12.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.43%

-8.96%

-1.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.33%

-15.64%

-0.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.83%

-25.24%

+2.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.04%

-4.83%

+0.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.81%

2.08%

+0.73%

Volatility

MPGVX vs. UCEQX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Mondrian Global Equity Value Fund (MPGVX) is 2.87%, while USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund (UCEQX) has a volatility of 3.46%. This indicates that MPGVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UCEQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MPGVXUCEQXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.87%

3.46%

-0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.54%

11.00%

-1.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.91%

13.29%

-1.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.73%

15.39%

-1.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.43%

16.47%

-3.04%

MPGVX vs. UCEQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MPGVX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than UCEQX's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

MPGVX vs. UCEQX - Dividend Comparison

MPGVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.59%, more than UCEQX's 4.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MPGVX
Mondrian Global Equity Value Fund
7.59%8.38%1.53%1.80%2.53%1.54%1.61%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UCEQX
USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund
4.40%5.08%2.56%5.10%6.80%4.61%8.25%4.79%6.73%1.91%3.16%3.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


MPGVX and UCEQX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UCEQX has higher volatility (3.46%) compared to MPGVX (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MPGVX dropped -22.83% vs UCEQX's -35.33%.

UCEQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MPGVX and UCEQX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer