MPGVX vs. CSUAX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

MPGVX (Mondrian Global Equity Value Fund) and CSUAX (Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A) are both mutual funds - MPGVX is a Global Equities fund managed by Mondrian, while CSUAX is a Infrastructure Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global Core Infrastructure 50/50 Index. Over the past 5 years, MPGVX returned 9.90%/yr vs 7.33%/yr for CSUAX. Their 0.65 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. MPGVX charges 0.74%/yr vs 1.22%/yr for CSUAX.

Performance

MPGVX vs. CSUAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mondrian Global Equity Value Fund (MPGVX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MPGVX achieves a 9.20% return, which is significantly lower than CSUAX's 12.43% return.

MPGVX

• 1D: 0.80%
• 1M: 3.75%
• 6M: 5.17%
• YTD: 9.20%
• 1Y: 20.97%
• 3Y*: 15.56%
• 5Y*: 9.90%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.95%

CSUAX

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 0.08%
• 6M: 8.01%
• YTD: 12.43%
• 1Y: 17.62%
• 3Y*: 11.66%
• 5Y*: 7.33%
• 10Y*: 7.23%
• ALL TIME*: 9.26%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
MPGVX Mondrian Global Equity Value Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

MPGVX vs. CSUAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
MPGVX Mondrian Global Equity Value Fund	9.20%	28.63%	2.87%	22.43%	-9.49%	10.90%	18.10%
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A	12.43%	14.30%	8.30%	2.09%	-5.20%	16.24%	11.28%

Correlation

The correlation between MPGVX and CSUAX is 0.41, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.41
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.54
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2020	0.65

Over the past year, the correlation between MPGVX and CSUAX has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

MPGVX vs. CSUAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MPGVX

MPGVX Risk / Return Rank: 57
MPGVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
MPGVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
MPGVX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
MPGVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
MPGVX Martin Ratio Rank: 47

CSUAX

CSUAX Risk / Return Rank: 79
CSUAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
CSUAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
CSUAX Omega Ratio Rank: 74
CSUAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
CSUAX Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MPGVX vs. CSUAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mondrian Global Equity Value Fund (MPGVX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MPGVX	CSUAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.63	1.81	-0.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.34	2.61	-0.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.32	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.87	3.07	-1.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.91	9.66	-2.76

MPGVX vs. CSUAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MPGVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the CSUAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MPGVX and CSUAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MPGVX vs. CSUAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MPGVX drawdown since its inception was -22.83%, smaller than the maximum CSUAX drawdown of -52.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MPGVX and CSUAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MPGVX	CSUAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.83%	-52.20%	+29.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.43%	-5.99%	-4.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.33%	-11.83%	-4.50%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.83%	-20.45%	-2.38%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.05%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.65%	+1.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.05%	-8.39%	+4.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.82%	1.89%	+0.93%

Volatility

MPGVX vs. CSUAX - Volatility Comparison

Mondrian Global Equity Value Fund (MPGVX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) have volatilities of 2.99% and 3.00%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MPGVX	CSUAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.99%	3.00%	-0.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.52%	8.16%	+1.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.95%	10.12%	+1.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.73%	13.00%	+0.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.44%	14.88%	-1.44%

MPGVX vs. CSUAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MPGVX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than CSUAX's 1.22% expense ratio.

Dividends

MPGVX vs. CSUAX - Dividend Comparison

MPGVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.68%, which matches CSUAX's 7.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A	7.61%	8.09%	2.23%	2.17%	3.55%	2.95%	1.30%	1.52%	2.08%	5.00%	2.04%	6.20%
MPGVX Mondrian Global Equity Value Fund	7.68%	8.38%	1.53%	1.80%	2.53%	1.54%	1.61%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MPGVX and CSUAX in my portfolio?

MPGVX and CSUAX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MPGVX or CSUAX?

CSUAX has higher volatility (3.00%) compared to MPGVX (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MPGVX dropped -22.83% vs CSUAX's -52.20%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CSUAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.