MPGVX vs. GQFPX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Mondrian Global Equity Value Fund (MPGVX) and GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX).

MPGVX is managed by Mondrian. It was launched on Jun 29, 2020. GQFPX is managed by GQG Partners Inc. It was launched on Jun 29, 2021.

Performance

MPGVX vs. GQFPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mondrian Global Equity Value Fund (MPGVX) and GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MPGVX vs. GQFPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
MPGVX Mondrian Global Equity Value Fund	-1.85%	28.63%	2.87%	22.43%	-9.49%	-0.34%
GQFPX GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund	10.08%	19.29%	4.81%	15.09%	-1.13%	5.03%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MPGVX achieves a -1.85% return, which is significantly lower than GQFPX's 10.08% return.

MPGVX

• 1D: 2.91%
• 1M: -6.69%
• YTD: -1.85%
• 6M: 2.95%
• 1Y: 19.43%
• 3Y*: 15.07%
• 5Y*: 8.42%
• 10Y*: —

GQFPX

• 1D: 0.37%
• 1M: -2.10%
• YTD: 10.08%
• 6M: 11.45%
• 1Y: 19.15%
• 3Y*: 16.47%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MPGVX vs. GQFPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MPGVX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than GQFPX's 0.86% expense ratio.

GQFPX

GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund

MPGVX

Mondrian Global Equity Value Fund

Return for Risk

MPGVX vs. GQFPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MPGVX

MPGVX Risk / Return Rank: 66
MPGVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
MPGVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
MPGVX Omega Ratio Rank: 62
MPGVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
MPGVX Martin Ratio Rank: 64

GQFPX

GQFPX Risk / Return Rank: 78
GQFPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
GQFPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
GQFPX Omega Ratio Rank: 79
GQFPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
GQFPX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MPGVX vs. GQFPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mondrian Global Equity Value Fund (MPGVX) and GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MPGVX	GQFPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.32	1.58	-0.27
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.91	2.03	-0.12
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.33	-0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.85	1.96	-0.11
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.38	9.35	-1.97
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MPGVX vs. GQFPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MPGVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is comparable to the GQFPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MPGVX and GQFPX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MPGVX	GQFPX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.32	1.58	-0.27
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.62	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.87	0.87	0.00

Correlation

The correlation between MPGVX and GQFPX is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

MPGVX vs. GQFPX - Dividend Comparison

MPGVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.54%, more than GQFPX's 4.83% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
MPGVX Mondrian Global Equity Value Fund	8.54%	8.38%	1.53%	1.80%	2.53%	1.54%	1.61%
GQFPX GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund	4.83%	5.32%	3.71%	3.69%	5.18%	1.38%	0.00%

Drawdowns

MPGVX vs. GQFPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MPGVX drawdown since its inception was -22.83%, which is greater than GQFPX's maximum drawdown of -16.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MPGVX and GQFPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MPGVX	GQFPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.83%	-16.95%	-5.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.43%	-9.37%	-1.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.83%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.83%	-2.80%	-5.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.14%	-3.03%	-1.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.62%	2.08%	+0.54%

Volatility

MPGVX vs. GQFPX - Volatility Comparison

Mondrian Global Equity Value Fund (MPGVX) has a higher volatility of 5.85% compared to GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX) at 3.97%. This indicates that MPGVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GQFPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MPGVX	GQFPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.85%	3.97%	+1.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.99%	6.99%	+2.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.80%	12.37%	+2.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.61%	12.88%	+0.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.52%	12.88%	+0.64%