MPG vs. QTAP
MPG (Leverage Shares 2X Long MP Daily ETF) and QTAP (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MPG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTAP.
Performance
MPG vs. QTAP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MPG achieves a -44.51% return, which is significantly lower than QTAP's 12.99% return.
MPG
- 1D
- -2.60%
- 1M
- -43.38%
- 6M
- -68.37%
- YTD
- -44.51%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
QTAP
- 1D
- -0.78%
- 1M
- 0.14%
- 6M
- 12.25%
- YTD
- 12.99%
- 1Y
- 19.02%
- 3Y*
- 18.85%
- 5Y*
- 12.10%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.40%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $644.61K | $915.06K | $1.08M | |
| $206.33K | $140.81K | $202.01K |
MPG vs. QTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MPG Leverage Shares 2X Long MP Daily ETF | -44.51% | -49.37% |
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April | 12.99% | 1.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between MPG and QTAP is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2025 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MPG vs. QTAP — Risk / Return Rank
MPG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QTAP
MPG vs. QTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long MP Daily ETF (MPG) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MPG | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.71 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 7.67 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 37.05 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MPG vs. QTAP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MPG drawdown since its inception was -71.90%, which is greater than QTAP's maximum drawdown of -29.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MPG and QTAP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MPG | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.90% | -29.44% | -42.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -71.90% | -1.56% | -70.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.58% | -4.93% | -33.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.51% | — |
Volatility
MPG vs. QTAP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MPG | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.26% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 5.38% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 143.17% | 6.35% | +136.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 143.17% | 18.92% | +124.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 143.17% | 18.59% | +124.58% |
MPG vs. QTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison
MPG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than QTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
MPG vs. QTAP - Dividend Comparison
Neither MPG nor QTAP has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
MPG and QTAP have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MPG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MPG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for QTAP.
MPG and QTAP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for MPG and 0.79% for QTAP.
Find the right allocation for MPG and QTAP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer