PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MPFDX vs. VLTCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MPFDX vs. VLTCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust Corporate Bond Portfolio (MPFDX) and Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares (VLTCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MPFDX achieves a 0.48% return, which is significantly lower than VLTCX's 1.02% return. Over the past 10 years, MPFDX has outperformed VLTCX with an annualized return of 3.13%, while VLTCX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.45% annualized return.


MPFDX

1D
0.09%
1M
0.01%
YTD
0.48%
6M
0.58%
1Y
5.54%
3Y*
5.78%
5Y*
0.71%
10Y*
3.13%

VLTCX

1D
0.25%
1M
0.37%
YTD
1.02%
6M
0.64%
1Y
6.92%
3Y*
4.64%
5Y*
-1.70%
10Y*
2.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MPFDX vs. VLTCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MPFDX
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust Corporate Bond Portfolio
0.48%7.75%2.69%10.05%-16.28%-1.92%10.32%15.73%-3.87%6.91%
VLTCX
Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares
1.02%7.27%-1.47%11.05%-25.77%-1.16%13.68%23.19%-6.85%12.40%

Correlation

The correlation between MPFDX and VLTCX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2009

0.91

The correlation between MPFDX and VLTCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MPFDX vs. VLTCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MPFDX
MPFDX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
MPFDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MPFDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
MPFDX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
MPFDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
MPFDX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

VLTCX
VLTCX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
VLTCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VLTCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
VLTCX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
VLTCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
VLTCX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MPFDX vs. VLTCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust Corporate Bond Portfolio (MPFDX) and Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares (VLTCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MPFDXVLTCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.15

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

1.26

+0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.63

3.09

+2.54

MPFDX vs. VLTCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MPFDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is higher than the VLTCX Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MPFDX and VLTCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MPFDXVLTCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.32

0.88

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

-0.14

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.23

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.08

0.45

+0.63

Drawdowns

MPFDX vs. VLTCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MPFDX drawdown since its inception was -25.17%, smaller than the maximum VLTCX drawdown of -34.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MPFDX and VLTCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MPFDXVLTCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.17%

-34.56%

+9.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.06%

-5.29%

+2.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.46%

-12.87%

+6.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.81%

-34.56%

+11.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.17%

-34.56%

+9.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.44%

-13.97%

+11.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.13%

-8.04%

+4.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.95%

2.16%

-1.21%

Volatility

MPFDX vs. VLTCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust Corporate Bond Portfolio (MPFDX) is 1.36%, while Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares (VLTCX) has a volatility of 2.34%. This indicates that MPFDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VLTCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MPFDXVLTCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.36%

2.34%

-0.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.99%

5.47%

-2.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.12%

7.67%

-3.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.46%

11.86%

-5.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.16%

10.60%

-4.44%

MPFDX vs. VLTCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MPFDX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than VLTCX's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

MPFDX vs. VLTCX - Dividend Comparison

MPFDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, less than VLTCX's 5.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MPFDX
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust Corporate Bond Portfolio
4.58%4.58%5.40%4.41%3.17%4.74%5.79%2.98%3.04%2.92%3.05%3.12%
VLTCX
Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares
5.51%5.48%5.58%4.65%4.41%3.03%3.15%3.82%4.56%4.01%4.37%4.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, MPFDX and VLTCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VLTCX has higher volatility (2.34%) compared to MPFDX (1.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MPFDX dropped -25.17% vs VLTCX's -34.56%.

MPFDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MPFDX and VLTCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer