MPBFX vs. QDIBX
Compare and contrast key facts about BNY Mellon Bond Fund (MPBFX) and Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans (QDIBX).
MPBFX is managed by BNY Mellon. It was launched on Oct 2, 2000. QDIBX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Dec 13, 2019.
Performance
MPBFX vs. QDIBX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MPBFX vs. QDIBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MPBFX BNY Mellon Bond Fund | -0.45% | 7.20% | 1.08% | 5.48% | -13.55% | -1.50% | 7.87% | -0.15% |
QDIBX Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans | 0.00% | 7.72% | 1.66% | 6.71% | -14.11% | -0.17% | 6.77% | -0.10% |
Returns By Period
MPBFX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.70%
- YTD
- -0.45%
- 6M
- 0.21%
- 1Y
- 3.57%
- 3Y*
- 3.30%
- 5Y*
- -0.13%
- 10Y*
- 1.59%
QDIBX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -1.22%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.90%
- 1Y
- 4.08%
- 3Y*
- 4.27%
- 5Y*
- 0.37%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MPBFX vs. QDIBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MPBFX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than QDIBX's 0.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MPBFX vs. QDIBX — Risk / Return Rank
MPBFX
QDIBX
MPBFX vs. QDIBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Bond Fund (MPBFX) and Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans (QDIBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MPBFX | QDIBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.92 | 1.06 | -0.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.32 | 1.55 | -0.22 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.19 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.54 | 1.81 | -0.27 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.40 | 5.30 | -0.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MPBFX | QDIBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 | 1.06 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 | 0.06 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | 0.17 | +0.67 |
Correlation
The correlation between MPBFX and QDIBX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MPBFX vs. QDIBX - Dividend Comparison
MPBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.53%, which matches QDIBX's 3.50% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MPBFX BNY Mellon Bond Fund | 3.53% | 3.82% | 3.70% | 3.17% | 2.86% | 2.33% | 4.64% | 2.87% | 3.00% | 2.89% | 3.12% | 2.77% |
QDIBX Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans | 3.50% | 3.50% | 3.55% | 3.65% | 2.51% | 1.80% | 3.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
MPBFX vs. QDIBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MPBFX drawdown since its inception was -18.40%, smaller than the maximum QDIBX drawdown of -19.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MPBFX and QDIBX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MPBFX | QDIBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.40% | -19.63% | +1.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.58% | -2.58% | 0.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.40% | -19.63% | +1.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.40% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.18% | -1.76% | -1.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.40% | -6.52% | +4.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.91% | 0.88% | +0.03% |
Volatility
MPBFX vs. QDIBX - Volatility Comparison
BNY Mellon Bond Fund (MPBFX) has a higher volatility of 1.57% compared to Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans (QDIBX) at 1.46%. This indicates that MPBFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDIBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MPBFX | QDIBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.57% | 1.46% | +0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.49% | 2.54% | -0.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.20% | 4.32% | -0.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.83% | 6.58% | -0.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.82% | 6.32% | -1.50% |