MP vs. LUNR
MP (MP Materials Corp.) and LUNR (Intuitive Machines Inc. ) are both stocks. MP operates in Other Industrial Metals & Mining (Basic Materials), while LUNR operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials). Over the past 3 years, MP returned 36.26%/yr vs 42.24%/yr for LUNR. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MP vs. LUNR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MP achieves a 13.92% return, which is significantly lower than LUNR's 64.02% return.
MP
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- -9.70%
- YTD
- 13.92%
- 6M
- 1.57%
- 1Y
- 97.09%
- 3Y*
- 36.26%
- 5Y*
- 12.44%
- 10Y*
- —
LUNR
- 1D
- -13.12%
- 1M
- -25.39%
- YTD
- 64.02%
- 6M
- 122.39%
- 1Y
- 144.44%
- 3Y*
- 42.24%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MP vs. LUNR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MP MP Materials Corp. | 13.92% | 223.85% | -21.41% | -18.25% | -46.54% | 3.60% |
LUNR Intuitive Machines Inc. | 64.02% | -10.63% | 610.76% | -74.45% | 3.73% | -0.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between MP and LUNR is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2021 | 0.28 |
The correlation between MP and LUNR shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (all time) to 0.48 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MP:
-$0.53
LUNR:
-$0.00
MP:
25.36
LUNR:
2.95K
MP:
$305.30M
LUNR:
$334.27M
MP:
$25.30M
LUNR:
$85.92M
MP:
$1.52M
LUNR:
-$96.76M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MP vs. LUNR — Risk / Return Rank
MP
LUNR
MP vs. LUNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MP Materials Corp. (MP) and Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MP | LUNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.26 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.82 | 3.47 | -1.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.03 | 7.12 | -4.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MP vs. LUNR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MP drawdown since its inception was -81.99%, smaller than the maximum LUNR drawdown of -97.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MP and LUNR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MP | LUNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.99% | -97.43% | +15.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.79% | -41.94% | -11.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -59.47% | -78.54% | +19.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -81.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.66% | -67.53% | +25.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.59% | -63.21% | +20.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 32.16% | 20.37% | +11.79% |
Volatility
MP vs. LUNR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MP Materials Corp. (MP) is 23.98%, while Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR) has a volatility of 42.95%. This indicates that MP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LUNR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MP | LUNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.98% | 42.95% | -18.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.77% | 93.42% | -41.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 93.56% | 111.16% | -17.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 69.63% | 171.29% | -101.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 72.65% | 171.29% | -98.64% |
Dividends
MP vs. LUNR - Dividend Comparison
Neither MP nor LUNR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
MP vs. LUNR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MP Materials Corp. and Intuitive Machines Inc. . You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MP vs. LUNR - Profitability Comparison
MP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MP Materials Corp. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 90.65M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
LUNR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intuitive Machines Inc. reported a gross profit of 72.82M and revenue of 186.73M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.0%.
MP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MP Materials Corp. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 90.65M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
LUNR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intuitive Machines Inc. reported an operating income of -39.20M and revenue of 186.73M, resulting in an operating margin of -21.0%.
MP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MP Materials Corp. reported a net income of -7.97M and revenue of 90.65M, resulting in a net margin of -8.8%.
LUNR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intuitive Machines Inc. reported a net income of -37.55M and revenue of 186.73M, resulting in a net margin of -20.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MP and LUNR have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LUNR has higher volatility (42.95%) compared to MP (23.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MP dropped -81.99% vs LUNR's -97.43%.
LUNR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MP and LUNR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer