PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MOOD vs. YCS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MOOD vs. YCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOOD achieves a 13.27% return, which is significantly higher than YCS's 7.29% return.


MOOD

1D
0.04%
1M
-0.12%
6M
5.83%
YTD
13.27%
1Y
32.12%
3Y*
19.14%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.16%

YCS

1D
-0.84%
1M
-2.27%
6M
9.33%
YTD
7.29%
1Y
25.05%
3Y*
17.34%
5Y*
23.55%
10Y*
13.76%
ALL TIME*
6.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$594.91K$566.29K$735.34K
$1.53M$2.43M$1.42M

MOOD vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
MOOD
Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF
13.27%30.39%12.53%12.56%-3.31%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
7.29%9.04%35.41%28.70%4.66%

Correlation

The correlation between MOOD and YCS is -0.21, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2022

-0.25

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MOOD vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MOOD
MOOD Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
MOOD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOOD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOOD Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
MOOD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOOD Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

YCS
YCS Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
YCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
YCS Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
YCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
YCS Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MOOD vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MOODYCSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.23

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.23

2.35

+0.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.79

8.93

+0.86

MOOD vs. YCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MOOD Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is higher than the YCS Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MOOD and YCS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MOOD vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOOD drawdown since its inception was -14.34%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOOD and YCS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MOODYCSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.34%

-49.56%

+35.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.71%

-8.30%

-1.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.71%

-23.05%

+13.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.08%

-5.68%

+3.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.30%

-19.75%

+17.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.20%

2.64%

+0.56%

Volatility

MOOD vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD) is 2.45%, while ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) has a volatility of 5.30%. This indicates that MOOD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MOODYCSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.45%

5.30%

-2.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.23%

11.65%

+0.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.69%

16.85%

-2.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.09%

21.16%

-9.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.09%

18.61%

-6.52%

MOOD vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

MOOD has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

MOOD vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison

MOOD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
MOOD
Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF
0.36%0.40%1.33%1.34%1.43%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MOOD and YCS have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YCS has higher volatility (5.30%) compared to MOOD (2.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOOD dropped -14.34% vs YCS's -49.56%.

On 3-year performance, MOOD leads with 19.14% vs 17.34% for YCS. On fees, MOOD is cheaper at 0.73% per year. On volatility, MOOD has been the lower-risk option at 2.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, MOOD has performed better with a 19.14% return vs 17.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MOOD is cheaper with a 0.73% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.

MOOD has the higher dividend yield at 0.36%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.

MOOD is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.73% for MOOD and 1.00% for YCS.

MOOD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MOOD and YCS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer