PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MOOD vs. SFTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MOOD vs. SFTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD) and Horizon International Managed Risk ETF (SFTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOOD achieves a 14.40% return, which is significantly lower than SFTX's 22.26% return.


MOOD

1D
-0.58%
1M
3.67%
YTD
14.40%
6M
16.67%
1Y
36.14%
3Y*
20.58%
5Y*
10Y*

SFTX

1D
-0.29%
1M
7.93%
YTD
22.26%
6M
24.22%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MOOD vs. SFTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MOOD and SFTX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2025

0.77

MOOD vs. SFTX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MOOD
SFTX

Technology

27.6%
28.2%

Financial Services

15.7%
16.2%

Industrials

12.6%
12.1%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
5.9%

Healthcare

8.4%
10.1%

Communication Services

7.9%
4.5%

Consumer Defensive

5.1%
3.7%

Basic Materials

4.4%
8.6%

Energy

3.7%
8.0%

Utilities

2.7%
1.9%

Real Estate

2.5%
0.9%

Technology

MOOD
27.6%
SFTX
28.2%

Financial Services

MOOD
15.7%
SFTX
16.2%

Industrials

MOOD
12.6%
SFTX
12.1%

Consumer Cyclical

MOOD
9.5%
SFTX
5.9%

Healthcare

MOOD
8.4%
SFTX
10.1%

Communication Services

MOOD
7.9%
SFTX
4.5%

Consumer Defensive

MOOD
5.1%
SFTX
3.7%

Basic Materials

MOOD
4.4%
SFTX
8.6%

Energy

MOOD
3.7%
SFTX
8.0%

Utilities

MOOD
2.7%
SFTX
1.9%

Real Estate

MOOD
2.5%
SFTX
0.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MOOD vs. SFTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MOOD
MOOD Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
MOOD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOOD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOOD Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
MOOD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOOD Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

SFTX
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MOOD vs. SFTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD) and Horizon International Managed Risk ETF (SFTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MOODSFTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.60

MOOD vs. SFTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MOODSFTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.35

2.57

-1.22

Drawdowns

MOOD vs. SFTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOOD drawdown since its inception was -14.34%, which is greater than SFTX's maximum drawdown of -12.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOOD and SFTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MOODSFTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.34%

-12.75%

-1.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.61%

-0.29%

-0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.32%

-2.78%

+0.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.12%

Volatility

MOOD vs. SFTX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MOODSFTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.11%

21.65%

-7.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.07%

21.65%

-9.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.07%

21.65%

-9.58%

MOOD vs. SFTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MOOD has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than SFTX's 0.82% expense ratio.


Dividends

MOOD vs. SFTX - Dividend Comparison

MOOD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, more than SFTX's 0.20% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
MOOD
Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF
0.35%0.40%1.33%1.34%1.43%
SFTX
Horizon International Managed Risk ETF
0.20%0.25%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MOOD and SFTX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MOOD is cheaper at 0.68% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MOOD is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.82% for SFTX.

MOOD has the higher dividend yield at 0.35%, compared with 0.20% for SFTX.

They also come from different issuers: Relative Sentiment and Horizon. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for MOOD and 0.82% for SFTX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MOOD and SFTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer