MOOD vs. SCHD
MOOD (Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MOOD is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by Relative Sentiment, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. MOOD is actively managed, while SCHD is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MOOD returned 19.89%/yr vs 14.73%/yr for SCHD. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MOOD charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
MOOD vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MOOD achieves a 12.64% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 18.71% return.
MOOD
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- -0.30%
- YTD
- 12.64%
- 6M
- 14.97%
- 1Y
- 33.33%
- 3Y*
- 19.89%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHD
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 2.12%
- YTD
- 18.71%
- 6M
- 19.28%
- 1Y
- 26.37%
- 3Y*
- 14.73%
- 5Y*
- 8.49%
- 10Y*
- 12.65%
MOOD vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOOD Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF | 12.64% | 30.39% | 12.53% | 12.56% | -3.31% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 18.71% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | 2.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between MOOD and SCHD is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2022 | 0.64 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MOOD and SCHD has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
MOOD vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MOOD
SCHD
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Technology
MOOD
SCHD
Financial Services
MOOD
SCHD
Industrials
MOOD
SCHD
Consumer Cyclical
MOOD
SCHD
Healthcare
MOOD
SCHD
Communication Services
MOOD
SCHD
Consumer Defensive
MOOD
SCHD
Basic Materials
MOOD
SCHD
Energy
MOOD
SCHD
Utilities
MOOD
SCHD
Real Estate
MOOD
SCHD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MOOD vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
MOOD
SCHD
MOOD vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MOOD | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.43 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.45 | 5.74 | -2.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.67 | 14.06 | -3.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MOOD | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.34 | 2.43 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.76 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.31 | 0.86 | +0.45 |
Drawdowns
MOOD vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MOOD drawdown since its inception was -14.34%, smaller than the maximum SCHD drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOOD and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MOOD | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.34% | -33.37% | +19.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.71% | -4.61% | -5.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.71% | -16.13% | +6.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.14% | -1.64% | -0.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.32% | -3.32% | +1.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.13% | 1.88% | +1.25% |
Volatility
MOOD vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD) has a higher volatility of 3.59% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 2.83%. This indicates that MOOD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MOOD | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.59% | 2.83% | +0.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.55% | 7.60% | +4.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.33% | 10.94% | +3.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.10% | 14.38% | -2.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.10% | 16.72% | -4.62% |
MOOD vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
MOOD has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
MOOD vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
MOOD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than SCHD's 3.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOOD Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF | 0.36% | 0.40% | 1.33% | 1.34% | 1.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.27% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MOOD and SCHD have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MOOD has higher volatility (3.59%) compared to SCHD (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOOD dropped -14.34% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
On 3-year performance, MOOD leads with 19.89% vs 14.73% for SCHD. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, MOOD has performed better with a 19.89% return vs 14.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for MOOD.
SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.27%, compared with 0.36% for MOOD.
MOOD is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while SCHD is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Relative Sentiment and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for MOOD and 0.06% for SCHD.
SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MOOD and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer