PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MOO vs. UJUN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MOO vs. UJUN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) and Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - June (UJUN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOO achieves a 10.10% return, which is significantly higher than UJUN's 3.32% return.


MOO

1D
0.48%
1M
-4.21%
YTD
10.10%
6M
11.54%
1Y
13.06%
3Y*
3.07%
5Y*
-0.70%
10Y*
7.00%

UJUN

1D
-0.30%
1M
0.45%
YTD
3.32%
6M
4.16%
1Y
10.04%
3Y*
11.26%
5Y*
6.38%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MOO vs. UJUN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
MOO
VanEck Agribusiness ETF
10.10%15.61%-12.43%-8.57%-8.10%23.99%14.59%13.16%
UJUN
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - June
3.32%10.63%12.49%12.17%-8.86%5.09%7.15%6.80%

Correlation

The correlation between MOO and UJUN is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2019

0.61

Over the past year, the correlation between MOO and UJUN has dropped to 0.28 - well below their long-term average of 0.61, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

MOO vs. UJUN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MOO
UJUN

Consumer Defensive

37.9%
4.9%

Basic Materials

26.2%
1.8%

Industrials

20.3%
8.1%

Healthcare

15.4%
8.4%

Communication Services

-

10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.1%

Energy

-

3.5%

Financial Services

-

11.9%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Technology

-

36.2%

Utilities

-

2.3%

Consumer Defensive

MOO
37.9%
UJUN
4.9%

Basic Materials

MOO
26.2%
UJUN
1.8%

Industrials

MOO
20.3%
UJUN
8.1%

Healthcare

MOO
15.4%
UJUN
8.4%

Communication Services

MOO

-

UJUN
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

MOO

-

UJUN
10.1%

Energy

MOO

-

UJUN
3.5%

Financial Services

MOO

-

UJUN
11.9%

Real Estate

MOO

-

UJUN
1.9%

Technology

MOO

-

UJUN
36.2%

Utilities

MOO

-

UJUN
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MOO vs. UJUN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MOO
MOO Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
MOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOO Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
MOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOO Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

UJUN
UJUN Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
UJUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UJUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
UJUN Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
UJUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
UJUN Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MOO vs. UJUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) and Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - June (UJUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MOOUJUNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.55

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.55

3.55

-2.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.88

21.84

-17.96

MOO vs. UJUN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MOO Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is lower than the UJUN Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MOO and UJUN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MOOUJUNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

2.40

-1.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

0.77

-0.81

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.77

-0.55

Drawdowns

MOO vs. UJUN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOO drawdown since its inception was -69.53%, which is greater than UJUN's maximum drawdown of -13.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOO and UJUN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MOOUJUNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.53%

-13.73%

-55.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.45%

-2.84%

-5.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.83%

-11.24%

-15.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.52%

-11.96%

-27.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.50%

-0.30%

-17.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.97%

-2.07%

-14.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.37%

0.46%

+2.91%

Volatility

MOO vs. UJUN - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) has a higher volatility of 4.08% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - June (UJUN) at 0.41%. This indicates that MOO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UJUN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MOOUJUNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.08%

0.41%

+3.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.57%

3.25%

+7.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.88%

4.25%

+9.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.12%

8.32%

+8.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.19%

8.77%

+9.42%

MOO vs. UJUN - Expense Ratio Comparison

MOO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than UJUN's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

MOO vs. UJUN - Dividend Comparison

MOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, while UJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MOO
VanEck Agribusiness ETF
2.24%2.47%3.41%2.93%2.15%1.17%1.10%1.26%1.69%1.44%2.14%2.89%
UJUN
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - June
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.89%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MOO and UJUN have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MOO has higher volatility (4.08%) compared to UJUN (0.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOO dropped -69.53% vs UJUN's -13.73%.

On 5-year performance, UJUN leads with 6.38% vs -0.70% for MOO. On fees, MOO is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, UJUN has been the lower-risk option at 0.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, UJUN has performed better with a 6.38% return vs -0.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MOO is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for UJUN.

MOO has the higher dividend yield at 2.24%, compared with 0.00% for UJUN.

MOO tracks MVIS Global Agribusiness Index, while UJUN tracks Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect June Series Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for MOO and 0.79% for UJUN.

UJUN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MOO and UJUN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer