MOO vs. PDBA

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

MOO (VanEck Agribusiness ETF) and PDBA (Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MOO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Agribusiness Index, while PDBA is a Agricultural Commodities fund actively managed by Invesco. MOO is passively managed, while PDBA is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, MOO returned 1.24%/yr vs 11.84%/yr for PDBA. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MOO charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for PDBA.

Performance

MOO vs. PDBA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) and Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOO achieves a 5.15% return, which is significantly higher than PDBA's 4.26% return.

MOO

• 1D: -0.47%
• 1M: -4.65%
• YTD: 5.15%
• 6M: 5.57%
• 1Y: 6.63%
• 3Y*: 1.24%
• 5Y*: -1.12%
• 10Y*: 7.00%

PDBA

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: -3.59%
• YTD: 4.26%
• 6M: 4.14%
• 1Y: 3.91%
• 3Y*: 11.84%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MOO vs. PDBA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
MOO VanEck Agribusiness ETF	5.15%	15.61%	-12.43%	-8.57%	-5.60%
PDBA Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF	4.26%	-0.76%	34.16%	7.83%	-3.34%

Correlation

The correlation between MOO and PDBA is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.21
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 24, 2022	0.20

Return for Risk

MOO vs. PDBA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MOO

MOO Risk / Return Rank: 16
MOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
MOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
MOO Omega Ratio Rank: 15
MOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
MOO Martin Ratio Rank: 17

PDBA

PDBA Risk / Return Rank: 13
PDBA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
PDBA Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
PDBA Omega Ratio Rank: 13
PDBA Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
PDBA Martin Ratio Rank: 13

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MOO vs. PDBA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) and Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MOO	PDBA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.47	0.37	+0.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.77	0.59	+0.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.07	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.60	0.46	+0.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.66	0.98	+0.68

MOO vs. PDBA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MOO Sharpe Ratio is 0.47, which is comparable to the PDBA Sharpe Ratio of 0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MOO and PDBA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MOO vs. PDBA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOO drawdown since its inception was -69.53%, which is greater than PDBA's maximum drawdown of -12.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOO and PDBA.

Drawdown Indicators

	MOO	PDBA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.53%	-12.45%	-57.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.17%	-8.59%	-2.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.83%	-12.45%	-14.38%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.52%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.52%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-21.21%	-7.47%	-13.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.97%	-3.98%	-12.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.01%	4.02%	-0.01%

Volatility

MOO vs. PDBA - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) has a higher volatility of 3.32% compared to Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBA) at 2.67%. This indicates that MOO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDBA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MOO	PDBA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.32%	2.67%	+0.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.83%	6.70%	+4.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.06%	10.58%	+3.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.13%	13.27%	+3.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.14%	13.27%	+4.87%

MOO vs. PDBA - Expense Ratio Comparison

MOO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than PDBA's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

MOO vs. PDBA - Dividend Comparison

MOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%, less than PDBA's 3.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MOO VanEck Agribusiness ETF	2.35%	2.47%	3.41%	2.93%	2.15%	1.17%	1.10%	1.26%	1.69%	1.44%	2.14%	2.89%
PDBA Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF	3.19%	3.32%	13.01%	6.82%	0.74%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MOO and PDBA in my portfolio?

MOO and PDBA have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MOO or PDBA?

MOO has higher volatility (3.32%) compared to PDBA (2.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOO dropped -69.53% vs PDBA's -12.45%.

Which ETF is better, MOO or PDBA?

On 3-year performance, PDBA leads with 11.84% vs 1.24% for MOO. On fees, MOO is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, PDBA has been the lower-risk option at 2.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MOO or PDBA?

Over the 3-year period, PDBA has performed better with a 11.84% return vs 1.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MOO or PDBA?

MOO is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for PDBA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MOO or PDBA?

PDBA has the higher dividend yield at 3.19%, compared with 2.35% for MOO.

What is the main difference between MOO and PDBA?

MOO is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while PDBA is Agricultural Commodities. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for MOO and 0.59% for PDBA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.47 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.