PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MOO vs. OPTZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MOO vs. OPTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) and Optimize Strategy Index ETF (OPTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MOO vs. OPTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MOO
VanEck Agribusiness ETF
16.09%15.61%-7.30%
OPTZ
Optimize Strategy Index ETF
0.41%22.83%16.81%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOO achieves a 16.09% return, which is significantly higher than OPTZ's 0.41% return.


MOO

1D
1.43%
1M
-1.27%
YTD
16.09%
6M
17.90%
1Y
27.55%
3Y*
2.03%
5Y*
1.67%
10Y*
8.26%

OPTZ

1D
3.97%
1M
-6.58%
YTD
0.41%
6M
3.12%
1Y
35.27%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MOO vs. OPTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

MOO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than OPTZ's 0.25% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

MOO vs. OPTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MOO
MOO Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
MOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOO Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
MOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOO Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

OPTZ
OPTZ Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
OPTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OPTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
OPTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
OPTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
OPTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MOO vs. OPTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) and Optimize Strategy Index ETF (OPTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MOOOPTZDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.63

1.52

+0.11

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.33

2.23

+0.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.31

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.44

2.41

+0.03

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.05

11.20

-2.15

MOO vs. OPTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MOO Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the OPTZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MOO and OPTZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MOOOPTZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.63

1.52

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

1.02

-0.78

Correlation

The correlation between MOO and OPTZ is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

MOO vs. OPTZ - Dividend Comparison

MOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, more than OPTZ's 0.58% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MOO
VanEck Agribusiness ETF
2.13%2.47%3.41%2.93%2.15%1.17%1.10%1.26%1.69%1.44%2.14%2.89%
OPTZ
Optimize Strategy Index ETF
0.58%0.58%0.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

MOO vs. OPTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOO drawdown since its inception was -69.53%, which is greater than OPTZ's maximum drawdown of -25.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOO and OPTZ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MOOOPTZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.53%

-25.75%

-43.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.46%

-14.58%

+3.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.01%

-7.08%

-5.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.99%

-3.61%

-13.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.09%

3.13%

-0.04%

Volatility

MOO vs. OPTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) is 6.00%, while Optimize Strategy Index ETF (OPTZ) has a volatility of 7.53%. This indicates that MOO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OPTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MOOOPTZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.00%

7.53%

-1.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.81%

12.94%

-2.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.03%

23.36%

-6.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.09%

20.60%

-3.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.20%

20.60%

-2.40%