MOO vs. FARMX
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) and Fidelity Agricultural Productivity Fund (FARMX).
MOO is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS Global Agribusiness Index. It was launched on Aug 31, 2007. FARMX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Apr 15, 2020.
Performance
MOO vs. FARMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MOO vs. FARMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOO VanEck Agribusiness ETF | 16.09% | 15.61% | -12.43% | -8.57% | -8.10% | 23.99% | 49.36% |
FARMX Fidelity Agricultural Productivity Fund | 20.39% | 7.99% | -4.83% | -11.61% | 13.68% | 23.36% | 53.58% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MOO achieves a 16.09% return, which is significantly lower than FARMX's 20.39% return.
MOO
- 1D
- 1.43%
- 1M
- -1.27%
- YTD
- 16.09%
- 6M
- 17.90%
- 1Y
- 27.55%
- 3Y*
- 2.03%
- 5Y*
- 1.67%
- 10Y*
- 8.26%
FARMX
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- -2.42%
- YTD
- 20.39%
- 6M
- 19.16%
- 1Y
- 25.44%
- 3Y*
- 3.96%
- 5Y*
- 5.13%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MOO vs. FARMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MOO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than FARMX's 0.99% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MOO vs. FARMX — Risk / Return Rank
MOO
FARMX
MOO vs. FARMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) and Fidelity Agricultural Productivity Fund (FARMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MOO | FARMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.63 | 1.46 | +0.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.33 | 2.16 | +0.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.27 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.44 | 2.16 | +0.28 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.05 | 4.98 | +4.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MOO | FARMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.63 | 1.46 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 0.27 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.78 | -0.55 |
Correlation
The correlation between MOO and FARMX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MOO vs. FARMX - Dividend Comparison
MOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, more than FARMX's 1.53% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOO VanEck Agribusiness ETF | 2.13% | 2.47% | 3.41% | 2.93% | 2.15% | 1.17% | 1.10% | 1.26% | 1.69% | 1.44% | 2.14% | 2.89% |
FARMX Fidelity Agricultural Productivity Fund | 1.53% | 1.85% | 2.29% | 1.33% | 1.17% | 0.71% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
MOO vs. FARMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MOO drawdown since its inception was -69.53%, which is greater than FARMX's maximum drawdown of -30.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOO and FARMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MOO | FARMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.53% | -30.27% | -39.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.46% | -11.27% | -0.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.52% | -30.27% | -9.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.52% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.01% | -2.72% | -10.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.99% | -13.13% | -3.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.09% | 4.89% | -1.80% |
Volatility
MOO vs. FARMX - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) has a higher volatility of 6.00% compared to Fidelity Agricultural Productivity Fund (FARMX) at 5.52%. This indicates that MOO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FARMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MOO | FARMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.00% | 5.52% | +0.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.81% | 12.26% | -1.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.03% | 18.30% | -1.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.09% | 18.97% | -1.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.20% | 19.84% | -1.64% |