MOO vs. BITI

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

MOO (VanEck Agribusiness ETF) and BITI (ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MOO is a Natural Resources fund tracking the MVIS Global Agribusiness Index, while BITI is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MOO returned 2.31%/yr vs -31.62%/yr for BITI. At a correlation of -0.25, they often move in opposite directions. MOO charges 0.56%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for BITI.

Performance

MOO vs. BITI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOO achieves a 12.85% return, which is significantly lower than BITI's 24.48% return.

MOO

• 1D: 0.69%
• 1M: 5.33%
• 6M: 5.70%
• YTD: 12.85%
• 1Y: 15.37%
• 3Y*: 2.31%
• 5Y*: 0.55%
• 10Y*: 7.24%

BITI

• 1D: 1.13%
• 1M: 1.49%
• 6M: 35.86%
• YTD: 24.48%
• 1Y: 64.61%
• 3Y*: -31.62%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MOO vs. BITI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
MOO VanEck Agribusiness ETF	12.85%	15.61%	-12.43%	-8.57%	-0.40%
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF	24.48%	-1.76%	-62.60%	-66.17%	3.39%

Correlation

The correlation between MOO and BITI is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.17
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2022	-0.25

Return for Risk

MOO vs. BITI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MOO

MOO Risk / Return Rank: 34
MOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
MOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
MOO Omega Ratio Rank: 34
MOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
MOO Martin Ratio Rank: 31

BITI

BITI Risk / Return Rank: 52
BITI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
BITI Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
BITI Omega Ratio Rank: 46
BITI Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
BITI Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MOO vs. BITI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MOO	BITI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.08	1.47	-0.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.63	2.04	-0.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.25	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.38	2.57	-1.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.55	6.38	-2.82

MOO vs. BITI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MOO Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is comparable to the BITI Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MOO and BITI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MOO vs. BITI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOO drawdown since its inception was -69.53%, smaller than the maximum BITI drawdown of -92.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOO and BITI.

Drawdown Indicators

	MOO	BITI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.53%	-92.16%	+22.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.17%	-25.28%	+14.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.83%	-84.63%	+57.80%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.52%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.52%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.44%	-86.41%	+70.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.97%	-68.40%	+51.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.34%	10.16%	-5.82%

Volatility

MOO vs. BITI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) is 4.22%, while ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI) has a volatility of 10.76%. This indicates that MOO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MOO	BITI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.22%	10.76%	-6.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.11%	34.28%	-23.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.31%	44.15%	-29.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.17%	52.24%	-35.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.12%	52.24%	-34.12%

MOO vs. BITI - Expense Ratio Comparison

MOO has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than BITI's 1.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

MOO vs. BITI - Dividend Comparison

MOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, less than BITI's 15.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF	15.62%	1.60%	3.91%	3.33%	0.06%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MOO VanEck Agribusiness ETF	2.19%	2.47%	3.41%	2.93%	2.15%	1.17%	1.10%	1.26%	1.69%	1.44%	2.14%	2.89%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MOO and BITI in my portfolio?

MOO and BITI have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MOO or BITI?

BITI has higher volatility (10.76%) compared to MOO (4.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOO dropped -69.53% vs BITI's -92.16%.

Which ETF is better, MOO or BITI?

On 3-year performance, MOO leads with 2.31% vs -31.62% for BITI. On fees, MOO is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, MOO has been the lower-risk option at 4.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MOO or BITI?

Over the 3-year period, MOO has performed better with a 2.31% return vs -31.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MOO or BITI?

MOO is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BITI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MOO or BITI?

BITI has the higher dividend yield at 15.62%, compared with 2.19% for MOO.

What is the main difference between MOO and BITI?

MOO is categorized as Natural Resources, while BITI is Cryptocurrency. MOO tracks MVIS Global Agribusiness Index, while BITI tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for MOO and 1.03% for BITI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BITI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.