MOH vs. MBS
MOH (Molina Healthcare, Inc.) is a stock, while MBS (Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF) is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Angel Oak. Over the past year, MOH returned -32.49% vs 5.64% for MBS. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MOH vs. MBS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MOH achieves a 13.26% return, which is significantly higher than MBS's 0.74% return.
MOH
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- 6.74%
- YTD
- 13.26%
- 6M
- 19.84%
- 1Y
- -32.49%
- 3Y*
- -11.95%
- 5Y*
- -4.67%
- 10Y*
- 14.60%
MBS
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.53%
- YTD
- 0.74%
- 6M
- 1.05%
- 1Y
- 5.64%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MOH vs. MBS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MOH Molina Healthcare, Inc. | 13.26% | -40.37% | -27.55% |
MBS Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF | 0.74% | 8.13% | 5.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between MOH and MBS is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2024 | 0.14 |
The correlation between MOH and MBS shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (1 year) to 0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MOH vs. MBS — Risk / Return Rank
MOH
MBS
MOH vs. MBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Molina Healthcare, Inc. (MOH) and Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (MBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MOH | MBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.38 | -0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.54 | 2.57 | -3.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.73 | 7.46 | -8.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MOH vs. MBS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MOH drawdown since its inception was -70.76%, which is greater than MBS's maximum drawdown of -4.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOH and MBS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MOH | MBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.76% | -4.09% | -66.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -59.96% | -2.20% | -57.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -70.76% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -70.76% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.76% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -53.15% | -1.35% | -51.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.63% | -1.02% | -23.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 44.30% | 0.76% | +43.54% |
Volatility
MOH vs. MBS - Volatility Comparison
Molina Healthcare, Inc. (MOH) has a higher volatility of 12.08% compared to Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (MBS) at 0.75%. This indicates that MOH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MBS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MOH | MBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.08% | 0.75% | +11.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.64% | 2.04% | +41.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.92% | 2.77% | +57.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.87% | 3.96% | +35.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.80% | 3.96% | +36.84% |
Dividends
MOH vs. MBS - Dividend Comparison
MOH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.61%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
MBS Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF | 5.61% | 5.28% | 4.52% |
MOH Molina Healthcare, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MOH and MBS have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MOH has higher volatility (12.08%) compared to MBS (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOH dropped -70.76% vs MBS's -4.09%.
MBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs -0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MOH and MBS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer