MOGB.L vs. FUQA.L
MOGB.L (VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF) and FUQA.L (Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - MOGB.L tracks the Russell 1000 TR USD while FUQA.L tracks the Fidelity US Quality Income Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MOGB.L returned 4.16%/yr vs 12.29%/yr for FUQA.L. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MOGB.L charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FUQA.L.
Performance
MOGB.L vs. FUQA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
MOGB.L is traded in GBP, while FUQA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the FUQA.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
MOGB.L
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 2.20%
- 6M
- -2.02%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- 7.54%
- 3Y*
- 6.76%
- 5Y*
- 4.16%
- 10Y*
- 7.44%
FUQA.L
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 0.64%
- 6M
- 9.08%
- YTD
- 9.57%
- 1Y
- 20.00%
- 3Y*
- 15.78%
- 5Y*
- 12.29%
- 10Y*
- —
MOGB.L vs. FUQA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOGB.L VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 12.94% | 11.88% | -9.07% | 27.24% | 9.78% | 29.63% | 4.63% | -15.00% |
FUQA.L Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc | 9.57% | 8.56% | 19.50% | 11.85% | -0.00% | 27.82% | 8.23% | 27.23% | 1.10% | -13.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between MOGB.L and FUQA.L is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2017 | 0.83 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MOGB.L and FUQA.L has dropped to 0.62 - well below their long-term average of 0.83, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MOGB.L vs. FUQA.L — Risk / Return Rank
MOGB.L
FUQA.L
MOGB.L vs. FUQA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF (MOGB.L) and Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUQA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MOGB.L | FUQA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.39 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.68 | 3.31 | -2.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.57 | 13.25 | -11.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MOGB.L vs. FUQA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MOGB.L drawdown since its inception was -26.42%, roughly equal to the maximum FUQA.L drawdown of -27.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOGB.L and FUQA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MOGB.L | FUQA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.42% | -27.34% | +0.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.01% | -6.01% | -5.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.73% | -20.49% | -2.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.73% | -20.49% | -2.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.37% | -0.49% | -3.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.83% | -7.04% | -0.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.79% | 1.51% | +3.28% |
Volatility
MOGB.L vs. FUQA.L - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF (MOGB.L) has a higher volatility of 5.09% compared to Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUQA.L) at 2.42%. This indicates that MOGB.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FUQA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MOGB.L | FUQA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.09% | 2.42% | +2.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.66% | 6.85% | +2.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.66% | 9.58% | +3.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.05% | 19.12% | +0.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.73% | 22.35% | +0.38% |
MOGB.L vs. FUQA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
MOGB.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than FUQA.L's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
MOGB.L vs. FUQA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither MOGB.L nor FUQA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
MOGB.L and FUQA.L have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FUQA.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FUQA.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for MOGB.L.
MOGB.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while FUQA.L tracks Fidelity US Quality Income Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for MOGB.L and 0.25% for FUQA.L.
Find the right allocation for MOGB.L and FUQA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer