MODR.DE vs. IS3N.DE
MODR.DE (iShares Moderate Portfolio UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) and IS3N.DE (iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - MODR.DE is a Global Allocation fund actively managed by iShares, while IS3N.DE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (IMI). MODR.DE is actively managed, while IS3N.DE is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MODR.DE returned 3.93%/yr vs 8.39%/yr for IS3N.DE. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MODR.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for IS3N.DE.
Performance
MODR.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MODR.DE achieves a 6.71% return, which is significantly lower than IS3N.DE's 26.15% return.
MODR.DE
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- 6M
- 6.54%
- YTD
- 6.71%
- 1Y
- 12.69%
- 3Y*
- 9.29%
- 5Y*
- 3.93%
- 10Y*
- —
IS3N.DE
- 1D
- 2.11%
- 1M
- -1.18%
- 6M
- 22.85%
- YTD
- 26.15%
- 1Y
- 42.71%
- 3Y*
- 19.59%
- 5Y*
- 8.39%
- 10Y*
- 9.80%
MODR.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MODR.DE iShares Moderate Portfolio UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) | 6.71% | 7.37% | 9.34% | 8.76% | -15.49% | 11.65% | 5.35% |
IS3N.DE iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) | 26.15% | 17.14% | 13.88% | 7.20% | -13.85% | 7.09% | 14.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between MODR.DE and IS3N.DE is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2020 | 0.57 |
The correlation between MODR.DE and IS3N.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (all time) to 0.70 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MODR.DE vs. IS3N.DE — Risk / Return Rank
MODR.DE
IS3N.DE
MODR.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Moderate Portfolio UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (MODR.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MODR.DE | IS3N.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.40 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.44 | 4.04 | -1.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.15 | 13.47 | -3.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MODR.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MODR.DE drawdown since its inception was -17.98%, smaller than the maximum IS3N.DE drawdown of -35.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MODR.DE and IS3N.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MODR.DE | IS3N.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.98% | -35.06% | +17.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.18% | -10.52% | +5.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.57% | -19.18% | +8.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.98% | -21.99% | +4.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.44% | -4.56% | +4.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.42% | -9.24% | +3.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.25% | 3.16% | -1.91% |
Volatility
MODR.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Moderate Portfolio UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (MODR.DE) is 2.20%, while iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE) has a volatility of 8.89%. This indicates that MODR.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IS3N.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MODR.DE | IS3N.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.20% | 8.89% | -6.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.08% | 16.69% | -10.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.35% | 19.07% | -11.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.16% | 16.62% | -8.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.27% | 18.15% | -9.88% |
MODR.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
MODR.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IS3N.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MODR.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither MODR.DE nor IS3N.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
MODR.DE and IS3N.DE have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IS3N.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IS3N.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for MODR.DE.
MODR.DE is categorized as Global Allocation, while IS3N.DE is Emerging Markets Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for MODR.DE and 0.18% for IS3N.DE.
Find the right allocation for MODR.DE and IS3N.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer