MOAT vs. IUS
MOAT (VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF) and IUS (Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - MOAT tracks the Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index while IUS tracks the Invesco Strategic US Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MOAT returned 8.01%/yr vs 13.61%/yr for IUS. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MOAT charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for IUS.
Performance
MOAT vs. IUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MOAT achieves a -0.94% return, which is significantly lower than IUS's 15.71% return.
MOAT
- 1D
- -1.37%
- 1M
- 3.30%
- YTD
- -0.94%
- 6M
- -0.69%
- 1Y
- 14.97%
- 3Y*
- 11.34%
- 5Y*
- 8.01%
- 10Y*
- 13.37%
IUS
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 4.89%
- YTD
- 15.71%
- 6M
- 15.69%
- 1Y
- 33.27%
- 3Y*
- 20.93%
- 5Y*
- 13.61%
- 10Y*
- —
MOAT vs. IUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF | -0.94% | 13.20% | 10.73% | 31.89% | -13.66% | 24.12% | 14.84% | 34.79% | -9.72% |
IUS Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF | 15.71% | 16.94% | 16.51% | 20.79% | -8.34% | 32.17% | 15.09% | 29.34% | -12.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between MOAT and IUS is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2018 | 0.84 |
The correlation between MOAT and IUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
MOAT vs. IUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MOAT
IUS
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Communication Services
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Technology
MOAT
IUS
Consumer Defensive
MOAT
IUS
Healthcare
MOAT
IUS
Industrials
MOAT
IUS
Consumer Cyclical
MOAT
IUS
Financial Services
MOAT
IUS
Communication Services
MOAT
IUS
Real Estate
MOAT
IUS
Basic Materials
MOAT
-
IUS
Energy
MOAT
-
IUS
Utilities
MOAT
-
IUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MOAT vs. IUS — Risk / Return Rank
MOAT
IUS
MOAT vs. IUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) and Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF (IUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MOAT | IUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.60 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.21 | 5.44 | -4.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.77 | 23.27 | -19.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MOAT | IUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.09 | 3.26 | -2.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 0.91 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | 0.85 | -0.08 |
Drawdowns
MOAT vs. IUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MOAT drawdown since its inception was -33.31%, roughly equal to the maximum IUS drawdown of -34.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOAT and IUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MOAT | IUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.31% | -34.67% | +1.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.43% | -6.15% | -6.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.44% | -15.61% | -5.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.96% | -18.72% | -5.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.72% | -0.07% | -4.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.83% | -3.86% | +0.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.98% | 1.43% | +2.55% |
Volatility
MOAT vs. IUS - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) has a higher volatility of 3.82% compared to Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF (IUS) at 2.50%. This indicates that MOAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MOAT | IUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.82% | 2.50% | +1.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.87% | 7.41% | +2.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.86% | 10.26% | +3.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.18% | 15.00% | +3.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.68% | 18.04% | +0.64% |
MOAT vs. IUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
MOAT has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than IUS's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
MOAT vs. IUS - Dividend Comparison
MOAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, more than IUS's 1.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUS Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF | 1.28% | 1.48% | 1.52% | 1.72% | 1.78% | 1.46% | 1.74% | 1.77% | 0.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF | 1.37% | 1.36% | 1.37% | 0.86% | 1.25% | 1.08% | 1.46% | 1.31% | 1.79% | 1.07% | 1.17% | 2.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MOAT and IUS have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MOAT has higher volatility (3.82%) compared to IUS (2.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOAT dropped -33.31% vs IUS's -34.67%.
On 5-year performance, IUS leads with 13.61% vs 8.01% for MOAT. On fees, IUS is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, IUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IUS has performed better with a 13.61% return vs 8.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IUS is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for MOAT.
MOAT has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 1.28% for IUS.
MOAT tracks Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index, while IUS tracks Invesco Strategic US Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for MOAT and 0.19% for IUS.
IUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.26 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MOAT and IUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer