MOAT vs. FQAL

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

MOAT (VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF) and FQAL (Fidelity Quality Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MOAT is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index, while FQAL is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Fidelity U.S. Quality Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MOAT returned 8.20%/yr vs 12.53%/yr for FQAL. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MOAT charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for FQAL.

Performance

MOAT vs. FQAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) and Fidelity Quality Factor ETF (FQAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOAT achieves a -0.07% return, which is significantly lower than FQAL's 8.43% return.

MOAT

• 1D: 0.88%
• 1M: 3.57%
• YTD: -0.07%
• 6M: -0.05%
• 1Y: 15.51%
• 3Y*: 11.79%
• 5Y*: 8.20%
• 10Y*: 13.40%

FQAL

• 1D: 0.52%
• 1M: 4.16%
• YTD: 8.43%
• 6M: 8.42%
• 1Y: 21.58%
• 3Y*: 20.34%
• 5Y*: 12.53%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MOAT vs. FQAL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF	-0.07%	13.20%	10.73%	31.89%	-13.66%	24.12%	14.84%	34.79%	-1.28%	23.18%
FQAL Fidelity Quality Factor ETF	8.43%	16.93%	21.92%	24.20%	-19.70%	32.13%	16.17%	28.12%	-4.39%	23.03%

Correlation

The correlation between MOAT and FQAL is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.77
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2016	0.85

The correlation between MOAT and FQAL shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.85 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MOAT vs. FQAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MOAT	FQAL
Technology	32.8%	34.3%
Consumer Defensive	17.5%	4.4%
Healthcare	16.0%	8.9%
Industrials	13.5%	9.1%
Consumer Cyclical	10.3%	10.1%
Financial Services	6.7%	12.3%
Communication Services	2.4%	10.5%
Real Estate	0.8%	2.2%
Basic Materials	-	2.2%
Energy	-	3.9%
Utilities	-	2.2%

Return for Risk

MOAT vs. FQAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MOAT

MOAT Risk / Return Rank: 30
MOAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
MOAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
MOAT Omega Ratio Rank: 29
MOAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
MOAT Martin Ratio Rank: 28

FQAL

FQAL Risk / Return Rank: 59
FQAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
FQAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
FQAL Omega Ratio Rank: 58
FQAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
FQAL Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MOAT vs. FQAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) and Fidelity Quality Factor ETF (FQAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MOAT	FQAL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.12	1.93	-0.81
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.69	2.76	-1.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.35	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.25	2.57	-1.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.90	11.66	-7.76
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MOAT vs. FQAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MOAT Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is lower than the FQAL Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MOAT and FQAL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MOAT	FQAL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.12	1.93	-0.81
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45	0.78	-0.33
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.72	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.78	0.83	-0.05

Drawdowns

MOAT vs. FQAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOAT drawdown since its inception was -33.31%, roughly equal to the maximum FQAL drawdown of -33.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOAT and FQAL.

Drawdown Indicators

	MOAT	FQAL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.31%	-33.71%	+0.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.43%	-8.43%	-4.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.44%	-16.87%	-4.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.96%	-25.50%	+1.54%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.31%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.88%	0.00%	-3.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.83%	-4.59%	+0.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.98%	1.86%	+2.12%

Volatility

MOAT vs. FQAL - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) has a higher volatility of 3.86% compared to Fidelity Quality Factor ETF (FQAL) at 2.29%. This indicates that MOAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FQAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MOAT	FQAL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.86%	2.29%	+1.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.88%	8.58%	+1.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.85%	11.21%	+2.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.18%	16.18%	+2.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.68%	17.57%	+1.11%

MOAT vs. FQAL - Expense Ratio Comparison

MOAT has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than FQAL's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

MOAT vs. FQAL - Dividend Comparison

MOAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, more than FQAL's 1.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FQAL Fidelity Quality Factor ETF	1.11%	1.12%	1.20%	1.35%	1.52%	1.17%	1.46%	1.55%	1.73%	1.53%	0.43%	0.00%
MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF	1.36%	1.36%	1.37%	0.86%	1.25%	1.08%	1.46%	1.31%	1.79%	1.07%	1.17%	2.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MOAT and FQAL in my portfolio?

MOAT and FQAL have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MOAT or FQAL?

MOAT has higher volatility (3.86%) compared to FQAL (2.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOAT dropped -33.31% vs FQAL's -33.71%.

Which ETF is better, MOAT or FQAL?

On 5-year performance, FQAL leads with 12.53% vs 8.20% for MOAT. On fees, FQAL is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FQAL has been the lower-risk option at 2.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MOAT or FQAL?

Over the 5-year period, FQAL has performed better with a 12.53% return vs 8.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MOAT or FQAL?

FQAL is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for MOAT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MOAT or FQAL?

MOAT has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 1.11% for FQAL.

What is the main difference between MOAT and FQAL?

MOAT is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FQAL is Large Cap Growth Equities. MOAT tracks Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index, while FQAL tracks Fidelity U.S. Quality Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for MOAT and 0.29% for FQAL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FQAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.