FQAL vs. SCHD
FQAL (Fidelity Quality Factor ETF) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FQAL is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Fidelity U.S. Quality Factor Index, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FQAL returned 12.41%/yr vs 8.36%/yr for SCHD. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FQAL charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
FQAL vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FQAL achieves a 7.87% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 19.01% return.
FQAL
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 4.38%
- YTD
- 7.87%
- 6M
- 7.86%
- 1Y
- 21.12%
- 3Y*
- 20.04%
- 5Y*
- 12.41%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.70%
- YTD
- 19.01%
- 6M
- 18.63%
- 1Y
- 27.16%
- 3Y*
- 15.09%
- 5Y*
- 8.36%
- 10Y*
- 12.77%
FQAL vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FQAL Fidelity Quality Factor ETF | 7.87% | 16.93% | 21.92% | 24.20% | -19.70% | 32.13% | 16.17% | 28.12% | -4.39% | 23.03% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 19.01% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 27.29% | -5.56% | 20.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between FQAL and SCHD is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2016 | 0.76 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FQAL and SCHD has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.76, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
FQAL vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FQAL
SCHD
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Technology
FQAL
SCHD
Financial Services
FQAL
SCHD
Communication Services
FQAL
SCHD
Consumer Cyclical
FQAL
SCHD
Industrials
FQAL
SCHD
Healthcare
FQAL
SCHD
Consumer Defensive
FQAL
SCHD
Energy
FQAL
SCHD
Basic Materials
FQAL
SCHD
Utilities
FQAL
SCHD
Real Estate
FQAL
SCHD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FQAL vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
FQAL
SCHD
FQAL vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Quality Factor ETF (FQAL) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FQAL | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.89 | 2.49 | -0.60 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.70 | 3.87 | -1.16 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.45 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.52 | 5.91 | -3.40 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.41 | 14.53 | -3.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FQAL | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.89 | 2.49 | -0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 0.58 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.77 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 0.86 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
FQAL vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FQAL drawdown since its inception was -33.71%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHD drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FQAL and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FQAL | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.71% | -33.37% | -0.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.43% | -4.61% | -3.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.87% | -16.13% | -0.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.50% | -16.85% | -8.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.51% | -1.40% | +0.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.59% | -3.32% | -1.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.86% | 1.88% | -0.02% |
Volatility
FQAL vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Quality Factor ETF (FQAL) is 2.33%, while Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) has a volatility of 2.66%. This indicates that FQAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FQAL | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.33% | 2.66% | -0.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.57% | 7.66% | +0.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.21% | 10.96% | +0.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.18% | 14.38% | +1.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.58% | 16.72% | +0.86% |
FQAL vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
FQAL has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
FQAL vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
FQAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, less than SCHD's 3.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FQAL Fidelity Quality Factor ETF | 1.12% | 1.12% | 1.20% | 1.35% | 1.52% | 1.17% | 1.46% | 1.55% | 1.73% | 1.53% | 0.43% | 0.00% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.26% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FQAL and SCHD have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHD has higher volatility (2.66%) compared to FQAL (2.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FQAL dropped -33.71% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
On 5-year performance, FQAL leads with 12.41% vs 8.36% for SCHD. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, FQAL has been the lower-risk option at 2.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FQAL has performed better with a 12.41% return vs 8.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FQAL.
SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 1.12% for FQAL.
FQAL is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. FQAL tracks Fidelity U.S. Quality Factor Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FQAL and 0.06% for SCHD.
SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FQAL and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer