MOAT vs. BDGS
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS).
MOAT and BDGS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MOAT is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index. It was launched on Apr 24, 2012. BDGS is an actively managed fund by Bridges. It was launched on May 10, 2023.
Performance
MOAT vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MOAT vs. BDGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MOAT VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF | -6.62% | 13.20% | 10.73% | 16.71% |
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF | -1.41% | 10.61% | 19.07% | 8.31% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MOAT achieves a -6.62% return, which is significantly lower than BDGS's -1.41% return.
MOAT
- 1D
- 2.13%
- 1M
- -9.57%
- YTD
- -6.62%
- 6M
- -1.11%
- 1Y
- 11.38%
- 3Y*
- 10.72%
- 5Y*
- 7.98%
- 10Y*
- 13.48%
BDGS
- 1D
- 1.96%
- 1M
- -1.14%
- YTD
- -1.41%
- 6M
- 0.11%
- 1Y
- 10.54%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MOAT vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
MOAT has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.85% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MOAT vs. BDGS — Risk / Return Rank
MOAT
BDGS
MOAT vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MOAT | BDGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.58 | 0.99 | -0.41 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.97 | 1.67 | -0.71 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.28 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.88 | 1.80 | -0.91 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.37 | 9.34 | -5.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MOAT | BDGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 | 0.99 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 1.51 | -0.76 |
Correlation
The correlation between MOAT and BDGS is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
MOAT vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison
MOAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, more than BDGS's 0.56% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOAT VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF | 1.45% | 1.36% | 1.37% | 0.86% | 1.25% | 1.08% | 1.46% | 1.31% | 1.79% | 1.07% | 1.17% | 2.13% |
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF | 0.56% | 0.55% | 1.81% | 0.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
MOAT vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MOAT drawdown since its inception was -33.31%, which is greater than BDGS's maximum drawdown of -9.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOAT and BDGS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MOAT | BDGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.31% | -9.12% | -24.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.30% | -5.85% | -7.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.96% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.19% | -2.15% | -8.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.79% | -0.67% | -3.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.49% | 1.13% | +2.36% |
Volatility
MOAT vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) has a higher volatility of 4.81% compared to Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) at 3.39%. This indicates that MOAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MOAT | BDGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.81% | 3.39% | +1.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.12% | 5.09% | +5.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.76% | 10.70% | +9.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.10% | 8.35% | +9.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.71% | 8.35% | +10.36% |