PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MOAT vs. BBUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MOAT vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MOAT achieves a 5.78% return, which is significantly lower than BBUS's 11.30% return.


MOAT

1D
1.36%
1M
3.07%
6M
4.21%
YTD
5.78%
1Y
15.84%
3Y*
12.01%
5Y*
9.07%
10Y*
13.61%
ALL TIME*
13.91%

BBUS

1D
1.46%
1M
1.67%
6M
9.38%
YTD
11.30%
1Y
22.56%
3Y*
20.79%
5Y*
12.56%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$26.15M$23.57M$29.57M
$67.13M$66.89M$81.17M

MOAT vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
MOAT
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
5.78%13.20%10.73%31.89%-13.66%24.12%14.84%19.86%
BBUS
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF
11.30%17.77%24.89%27.20%-19.46%27.13%20.69%16.26%

Correlation

The correlation between MOAT and BBUS is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2019

0.86

Over the past year, the correlation between MOAT and BBUS has dropped to 0.64 - well below their long-term average of 0.86, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

MOAT vs. BBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MOAT
BBUS

Technology

30.8%
38.7%

Consumer Defensive

18.2%
4.4%

Healthcare

18.1%
8.9%

Consumer Cyclical

11.1%
9.4%

Industrials

9.5%
8.6%

Financial Services

9.2%
11.6%

Communication Services

2.4%
9.9%

Real Estate

0.7%
1.7%

Basic Materials

-

1.6%

Energy

-

3.0%

Utilities

-

2.2%

Technology

MOAT
30.8%
BBUS
38.7%

Consumer Defensive

MOAT
18.2%
BBUS
4.4%

Healthcare

MOAT
18.1%
BBUS
8.9%

Consumer Cyclical

MOAT
11.1%
BBUS
9.4%

Industrials

MOAT
9.5%
BBUS
8.6%

Financial Services

MOAT
9.2%
BBUS
11.6%

Communication Services

MOAT
2.4%
BBUS
9.9%

Real Estate

MOAT
0.7%
BBUS
1.7%

Basic Materials

MOAT

-

BBUS
1.6%

Energy

MOAT

-

BBUS
3.0%

Utilities

MOAT

-

BBUS
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MOAT vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MOAT
MOAT Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
MOAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOAT Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
MOAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOAT Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

BBUS
BBUS Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
BBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
BBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MOAT vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MOATBBUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.32

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.28

2.46

-1.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.82

10.36

-6.54

MOAT vs. BBUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MOAT Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is lower than the BBUS Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MOAT and BBUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MOAT vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MOAT drawdown since its inception was -33.31%, smaller than the maximum BBUS drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOAT and BBUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MOATBBUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.31%

-35.35%

+2.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.43%

-9.21%

-3.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.44%

-19.01%

-2.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.96%

-25.46%

+1.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.12%

+0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.82%

-5.38%

+1.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.16%

2.18%

+1.98%

Volatility

MOAT vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) has a higher volatility of 4.08% compared to JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) at 3.82%. This indicates that MOAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MOATBBUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.08%

3.82%

+0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.55%

10.23%

+0.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.01%

12.87%

+1.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.30%

17.17%

+1.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.63%

19.50%

-0.87%

MOAT vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

MOAT has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

MOAT vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison

MOAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, more than BBUS's 1.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBUS
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF
1.00%1.07%1.21%1.38%1.57%1.11%1.43%1.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MOAT
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
1.28%1.36%1.37%0.86%1.25%1.08%1.46%1.31%1.79%1.07%1.17%2.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


MOAT and BBUS have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MOAT has higher volatility (4.08%) compared to BBUS (3.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOAT dropped -33.31% vs BBUS's -35.35%.

On 5-year performance, BBUS leads with 12.56% vs 9.07% for MOAT. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, BBUS has been the lower-risk option at 3.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BBUS has performed better with a 12.56% return vs 9.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for MOAT.

MOAT has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 1.00% for BBUS.

MOAT tracks Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index, while BBUS tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for MOAT and 0.02% for BBUS.

BBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MOAT and BBUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer