MOAT vs. ARCC
MOAT (VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF) is Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index, while ARCC (Ares Capital Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, MOAT returned 13.47%/yr vs 13.20%/yr for ARCC. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MOAT vs. ARCC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MOAT achieves a -0.66% return, which is significantly higher than ARCC's -2.20% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MOAT having a 13.47% annualized return and ARCC not far behind at 13.20%.
MOAT
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 3.19%
- YTD
- -0.66%
- 6M
- -1.22%
- 1Y
- 14.57%
- 3Y*
- 10.55%
- 5Y*
- 7.78%
- 10Y*
- 13.47%
ARCC
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- 1.90%
- YTD
- -2.20%
- 6M
- -2.87%
- 1Y
- -3.87%
- 3Y*
- 10.27%
- 5Y*
- 9.04%
- 10Y*
- 13.20%
MOAT vs. ARCC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF | -0.66% | 13.20% | 10.73% | 31.89% | -13.66% | 24.12% | 14.84% | 34.79% | -1.28% | 23.18% |
ARCC Ares Capital Corporation | -2.20% | 1.07% | 19.78% | 20.03% | -3.84% | 36.14% | 0.86% | 31.30% | 8.81% | 4.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between MOAT and ARCC is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2012 | 0.50 |
The correlation between MOAT and ARCC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MOAT vs. ARCC — Risk / Return Rank
MOAT
ARCC
MOAT vs. ARCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) and Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MOAT | ARCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 0.97 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.02 | -0.26 | +1.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.11 | -0.47 | +3.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MOAT vs. ARCC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MOAT drawdown since its inception was -33.31%, smaller than the maximum ARCC drawdown of -79.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MOAT and ARCC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MOAT | ARCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.31% | -79.36% | +46.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.43% | -19.35% | +6.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.44% | -19.35% | -2.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.96% | -21.76% | -2.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.31% | -56.77% | +23.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.45% | -10.98% | +6.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.83% | -9.10% | +5.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.06% | 10.68% | -6.62% |
Volatility
MOAT vs. ARCC - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) has a higher volatility of 4.13% compared to Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) at 3.72%. This indicates that MOAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MOAT | ARCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.13% | 3.72% | +0.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.90% | 14.83% | -4.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.93% | 18.48% | -4.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.20% | 19.96% | -1.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.68% | 25.58% | -6.90% |
Dividends
MOAT vs. ARCC - Dividend Comparison
MOAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, less than ARCC's 9.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARCC Ares Capital Corporation | 7.48% | 9.49% | 8.77% | 9.59% | 10.12% | 7.65% | 9.47% | 9.01% | 9.88% | 9.67% | 9.22% | 11.02% |
MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF | 1.36% | 1.36% | 1.37% | 0.86% | 1.25% | 1.08% | 1.46% | 1.31% | 1.79% | 1.07% | 1.17% | 2.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MOAT and ARCC have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MOAT has higher volatility (4.13%) compared to ARCC (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MOAT dropped -33.31% vs ARCC's -79.36%.
MOAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.91 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MOAT and ARCC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer