PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MNY.TO vs. MJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MNY.TO vs. MJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Purpose Cash Management Fund (MNY.TO) and ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF (MJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MNY.TO vs. MJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
MNY.TO
Purpose Cash Management Fund
0.53%3.03%4.69%5.03%1.54%
MJ
ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF
-21.68%7.88%-17.44%-25.85%-21.48%
Different Trading Currencies

MNY.TO is traded in CAD, while MJ is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MJ values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MNY.TO achieves a 0.53% return, which is significantly higher than MJ's -21.68% return.


MNY.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
0.21%
YTD
0.53%
6M
1.27%
1Y
2.70%
3Y*
4.05%
5Y*
10Y*

MJ

1D
9.24%
1M
-5.51%
YTD
-21.68%
6M
-36.22%
1Y
16.28%
3Y*
-14.40%
5Y*
-36.42%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MNY.TO vs. MJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

MNY.TO has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than MJ's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

MNY.TO vs. MJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MNY.TO
MNY.TO Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
MNY.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MNY.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
MNY.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
MNY.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MNY.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

MJ
MJ Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
MJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
MJ Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
MJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
MJ Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MNY.TO vs. MJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Cash Management Fund (MNY.TO) and ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF (MJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MNY.TOMJDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

15.40

0.20

+15.20

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

52.97

1.08

+51.89

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

20.07

1.12

+18.95

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

67.62

0.32

+67.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

621.44

0.66

+620.79

MNY.TO vs. MJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MNY.TO Sharpe Ratio is 15.40, which is higher than the MJ Sharpe Ratio of 0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MNY.TO and MJ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MNY.TOMJDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.40

0.20

+15.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

11.03

-0.51

+11.54

Correlation

The correlation between MNY.TO and MJ is 0.01, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

MNY.TO vs. MJ - Dividend Comparison

MNY.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%, more than MJ's 2.57% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
MNY.TO
Purpose Cash Management Fund
2.67%2.93%4.71%4.85%1.47%
MJ
ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF
2.57%1.98%13.80%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

MNY.TO vs. MJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNY.TO drawdown since its inception was -0.24%, smaller than the maximum MJ drawdown of -96.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNY.TO and MJ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MNY.TOMJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.24%

-96.55%

+96.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.04%

-48.66%

+48.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-93.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-95.01%

+95.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-68.66%

+68.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.00%

23.07%

-23.07%

Volatility

MNY.TO vs. MJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Purpose Cash Management Fund (MNY.TO) is 0.03%, while ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF (MJ) has a volatility of 17.89%. This indicates that MNY.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MNY.TOMJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.03%

17.89%

-17.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.13%

59.11%

-58.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18%

84.51%

-84.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.38%

57.86%

-57.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.38%

54.11%

-53.73%