MNWIX vs. BIVRX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about MFS Managed Wealth Fund (MNWIX) and Invenomic Fund (BIVRX).

MNWIX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Jun 26, 2014. BIVRX is managed by Invenomic. It was launched on Jun 18, 2017.

Performance

MNWIX vs. BIVRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Managed Wealth Fund (MNWIX) and Invenomic Fund (BIVRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MNWIX vs. BIVRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MNWIX MFS Managed Wealth Fund	-4.50%	7.71%	6.42%	5.41%	-2.15%	1.35%	3.11%	8.70%	2.10%	0.74%
BIVRX Invenomic Fund	5.94%	4.39%	-9.03%	16.47%	49.61%	44.06%	11.12%	11.36%	3.41%	8.73%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MNWIX achieves a -4.50% return, which is significantly lower than BIVRX's 5.94% return.

MNWIX

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: -4.58%
• YTD: -4.50%
• 6M: -4.07%
• 1Y: 0.76%
• 3Y*: 4.67%
• 5Y*: 3.04%
• 10Y*: 3.33%

BIVRX

• 1D: 3.43%
• 1M: 2.62%
• YTD: 5.94%
• 6M: 11.17%
• 1Y: 6.87%
• 3Y*: 1.70%
• 5Y*: 13.81%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MNWIX vs. BIVRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MNWIX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is lower than BIVRX's 2.48% expense ratio.

BIVRX

Invenomic Fund

MNWIX

MFS Managed Wealth Fund

Return for Risk

MNWIX vs. BIVRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MNWIX

MNWIX Risk / Return Rank: 7
MNWIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
MNWIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
MNWIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6
MNWIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
MNWIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8

BIVRX

BIVRX Risk / Return Rank: 13
BIVRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
BIVRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
BIVRX Omega Ratio Rank: 12
BIVRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
BIVRX Martin Ratio Rank: 12

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MNWIX vs. BIVRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Managed Wealth Fund (MNWIX) and Invenomic Fund (BIVRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MNWIX	BIVRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.12	0.32	-0.20
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.20	0.65	-0.45
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.03	1.07	-0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.08	0.41	-0.34
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.33	0.93	-0.60
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MNWIX vs. BIVRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MNWIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.12, which is lower than the BIVRX Sharpe Ratio of 0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MNWIX and BIVRX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MNWIX	BIVRX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.12	0.32	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81	0.82	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.89	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.76	0.91	-0.14

Correlation

The correlation between MNWIX and BIVRX is -0.08. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

MNWIX vs. BIVRX - Dividend Comparison

MNWIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, less than BIVRX's 1.82% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MNWIX MFS Managed Wealth Fund	0.79%	0.76%	1.13%	0.78%	0.70%	0.13%	0.24%	0.54%	0.42%	0.94%	2.65%	1.19%
BIVRX Invenomic Fund	1.82%	1.93%	3.55%	20.26%	28.43%	3.00%	3.11%	3.21%	4.82%	1.21%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

MNWIX vs. BIVRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNWIX drawdown since its inception was -5.57%, smaller than the maximum BIVRX drawdown of -18.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNWIX and BIVRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MNWIX	BIVRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.57%	-18.29%	+12.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.57%	-13.79%	+8.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-5.57%	-17.66%	+12.09%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-5.57%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.50%	-1.19%	-4.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.13%	-5.91%	+4.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.32%	6.14%	-4.82%

Volatility

MNWIX vs. BIVRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Managed Wealth Fund (MNWIX) is 1.95%, while Invenomic Fund (BIVRX) has a volatility of 7.61%. This indicates that MNWIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BIVRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MNWIX	BIVRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.95%	7.61%	-5.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.10%	16.65%	-12.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.68%	20.73%	-15.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.79%	16.96%	-13.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.74%	17.09%	-13.35%