BIVRX vs. TMF
BIVRX (Invenomic Fund) and TMF (Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF) are both funds - BIVRX is a Long-Short fund managed by Invenomic, while TMF is a Leveraged Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index (300%). Over the past 5 years, BIVRX returned 6.28%/yr vs -31.19%/yr for TMF. At a correlation of -0.13, they often move in opposite directions. BIVRX charges 2.48%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for TMF.
Performance
BIVRX vs. TMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BIVRX achieves a -19.60% return, which is significantly lower than TMF's -4.08% return.
BIVRX
- 1D
- -2.58%
- 1M
- -8.16%
- YTD
- -19.60%
- 6M
- -17.41%
- 1Y
- -13.52%
- 3Y*
- -7.11%
- 5Y*
- 6.28%
- 10Y*
- —
TMF
- 1D
- -2.15%
- 1M
- 5.61%
- YTD
- -4.08%
- 6M
- -4.92%
- 1Y
- -1.09%
- 3Y*
- -20.90%
- 5Y*
- -31.19%
- 10Y*
- -16.82%
BIVRX vs. TMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIVRX Invenomic Fund | -19.60% | 4.39% | -9.03% | 16.47% | 49.61% | 44.06% | 11.12% | 11.36% | 3.41% | 8.73% |
TMF Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF | -4.08% | -2.94% | -35.95% | -13.01% | -72.60% | -19.80% | 39.02% | 34.75% | -11.01% | -0.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between BIVRX and TMF is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2017 | -0.13 |
The correlation between BIVRX and TMF shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (all time) to 0.05 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BIVRX vs. TMF — Risk / Return Rank
BIVRX
TMF
BIVRX vs. TMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invenomic Fund (BIVRX) and Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BIVRX | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.02 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.56 | -0.04 | -0.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.56 | -0.09 | -1.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BIVRX vs. TMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BIVRX drawdown since its inception was -25.01%, smaller than the maximum TMF drawdown of -92.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIVRX and TMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BIVRX | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.01% | -92.89% | +67.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.59% | -26.51% | +1.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.01% | -56.09% | +31.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.01% | -88.81% | +63.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -92.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.01% | -92.06% | +67.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.12% | -43.75% | +37.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.87% | 12.20% | -3.33% |
Volatility
BIVRX vs. TMF - Volatility Comparison
Invenomic Fund (BIVRX) has a higher volatility of 12.19% compared to Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF) at 6.48%. This indicates that BIVRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BIVRX | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.19% | 6.48% | +5.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.15% | 19.39% | +2.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.08% | 27.96% | -1.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.97% | 46.59% | -28.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.83% | 43.92% | -26.09% |
BIVRX vs. TMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
BIVRX has a 2.48% expense ratio, which is higher than TMF's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
BIVRX vs. TMF - Dividend Comparison
BIVRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.40%, less than TMF's 4.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIVRX Invenomic Fund | 2.40% | 1.93% | 3.55% | 20.26% | 28.43% | 3.00% | 3.11% | 3.21% | 4.82% | 1.21% |
TMF Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF | 4.06% | 4.06% | 4.29% | 2.82% | 1.62% | 0.13% | 2.23% | 0.94% | 1.49% | 0.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BIVRX and TMF have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BIVRX has higher volatility (12.19%) compared to TMF (6.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIVRX dropped -25.01% vs TMF's -92.89%.
TMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.04 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BIVRX and TMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer