MNVT vs. BOAT
MNVT (Moonvest ETF) and BOAT (SonicShares Global Shipping ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MNVT is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Moonvest, while BOAT is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Solactive Global Shipping Index. MNVT is actively managed, while BOAT is passively managed. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MNVT charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for BOAT.
Performance
MNVT vs. BOAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MNVT
- 1D
- -2.85%
- 1M
- -6.54%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
BOAT
- 1D
- 1.63%
- 1M
- 11.19%
- 6M
- 33.10%
- YTD
- 43.79%
- 1Y
- 52.96%
- 3Y*
- 28.42%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 24.75%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $972.74K | $904.80K | $980.36K | |
MNVT Moonvest ETF | $653.57K | $816.73K | $1.17M |
MNVT vs. BOAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MNVT Moonvest ETF | 6.40% |
BOAT SonicShares Global Shipping ETF | 13.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between MNVT and BOAT is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2026 | 0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MNVT vs. BOAT — Risk / Return Rank
MNVT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BOAT
MNVT vs. BOAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Moonvest ETF (MNVT) and SonicShares Global Shipping ETF (BOAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MNVT | BOAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.42 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.59 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 12.93 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MNVT vs. BOAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNVT drawdown since its inception was -23.74%, smaller than the maximum BOAT drawdown of -33.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNVT and BOAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MNVT | BOAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.74% | -33.94% | +10.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.60% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -33.94% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.74% | 0.00% | -23.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.51% | -9.55% | +1.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.11% | — |
Volatility
MNVT vs. BOAT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MNVT | BOAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.82% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.76% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.29% | 20.53% | +24.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.29% | 25.08% | +20.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.29% | 25.08% | +20.21% |
MNVT vs. BOAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
MNVT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than BOAT's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
MNVT vs. BOAT - Dividend Comparison
MNVT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BOAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.40%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOAT SonicShares Global Shipping ETF | 6.40% | 8.08% | 13.89% | 13.65% | 13.57% | 1.36% |
MNVT Moonvest ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MNVT and BOAT have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BOAT is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BOAT is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for MNVT.
BOAT has the higher dividend yield at 6.40%, compared with 0.00% for MNVT.
MNVT is categorized as Global Equities, while BOAT is Industrials Equities. They also come from different issuers: Moonvest and Tidal Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for MNVT and 0.69% for BOAT.
Find the right allocation for MNVT and BOAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer