PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MNTRX vs. BGEIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MNTRX vs. BGEIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Core Bond Fund (MNTRX) and American Century Global Gold Fund (BGEIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MNTRX achieves a -0.84% return, which is significantly higher than BGEIX's -11.13% return. Over the past 10 years, MNTRX has underperformed BGEIX with an annualized return of 1.15%, while BGEIX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.13% annualized return.


MNTRX

1D
0.09%
1M
-1.27%
6M
-1.08%
YTD
-0.84%
1Y
1.57%
3Y*
3.53%
5Y*
-0.71%
10Y*
1.15%
ALL TIME*
4.02%

BGEIX

1D
3.47%
1M
-2.24%
6M
-19.57%
YTD
-11.13%
1Y
48.85%
3Y*
38.61%
5Y*
18.36%
10Y*
10.13%
ALL TIME*
5.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MNTRX vs. BGEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MNTRX
Allspring Core Bond Fund
-0.84%7.16%1.38%5.37%-13.82%-2.10%8.51%8.18%-0.57%3.28%
BGEIX
American Century Global Gold Fund
-11.13%158.45%15.10%7.52%-12.54%-8.85%18.92%37.82%-7.43%10.62%

Correlation

The correlation between MNTRX and BGEIX is 0.27, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 1997

0.12

The correlation between MNTRX and BGEIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (all time) to 0.28 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MNTRX vs. BGEIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MNTRX
MNTRX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
MNTRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MNTRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
MNTRX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
MNTRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
MNTRX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

BGEIX
BGEIX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
BGEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BGEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
BGEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
BGEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
BGEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MNTRX vs. BGEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Core Bond Fund (MNTRX) and American Century Global Gold Fund (BGEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MNTRXBGEIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.21

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.79

1.30

-0.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.95

2.88

-0.93

MNTRX vs. BGEIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MNTRX Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is lower than the BGEIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MNTRX and BGEIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MNTRX vs. BGEIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNTRX drawdown since its inception was -19.36%, smaller than the maximum BGEIX drawdown of -78.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNTRX and BGEIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MNTRXBGEIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.36%

-78.69%

+59.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.06%

-38.61%

+35.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.21%

-38.61%

+33.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.91%

-46.62%

+27.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.36%

-51.92%

+32.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.24%

-33.63%

+29.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.47%

-35.14%

+32.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.24%

17.45%

-16.21%

Volatility

MNTRX vs. BGEIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Allspring Core Bond Fund (MNTRX) is 1.01%, while American Century Global Gold Fund (BGEIX) has a volatility of 11.67%. This indicates that MNTRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BGEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MNTRXBGEIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.01%

11.67%

-10.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.05%

37.64%

-34.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.90%

45.61%

-41.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.05%

34.42%

-28.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.97%

33.49%

-28.52%

MNTRX vs. BGEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MNTRX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than BGEIX's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

MNTRX vs. BGEIX - Dividend Comparison

MNTRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, more than BGEIX's 0.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BGEIX
American Century Global Gold Fund
0.91%0.85%1.36%1.56%1.38%2.13%0.56%0.87%0.00%0.00%10.56%0.00%
MNTRX
Allspring Core Bond Fund
3.74%4.07%4.13%3.19%1.85%1.75%6.35%2.46%2.33%1.74%1.97%1.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


MNTRX and BGEIX have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BGEIX has higher volatility (11.67%) compared to MNTRX (1.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MNTRX dropped -19.36% vs BGEIX's -78.69%.

BGEIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.11 vs 0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MNTRX and BGEIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer